I see the points the writer of this is trying to make, but there are some interesting details, especially when it comes to comparing the UK and France.
Compare France to the UK. I can park in nearly every town or village, they have marked truck parking bays, and somewhere nearby, will be a small routier, where I can get a meal and a shower, the locals respect me, and have no problems with me or my truck being there for the night.
Go out onto the motorway services, and I can park for no cost, go into the service area, and get a shower for a minimal cost, and have freshly cooked food, I even get to jump the queues, because others know that my time is limited, and respect I am there because it is my job. Add to that, I even get a 20% discount of all I purchase.
I grew up in a railway family, and as is probably obvious, I'm a bit of a tree hugging hippy. I remember being told many times that "of course railways aren't economical compared to trucks" when asking about the environmental impacts.
If there are "marked truck parking bays" in every town or village, and they are free at motorway service stations, and he gets a 20% discount, then either the service stations have a business model that assumes it's worth it for them to attract truck drivers, or it amounts to a substantial subsidy of trucking from local governments; after all, if I want to store 48 tons of goods in a town I'd have to pay rent.
...ask your local council just how well they cater for trucks in your district.
I know Canterbury has the grand total of zero truck parking facilities, but does have a lot of restrictions, making it difficult for trucks to stop anywhere.
Do you want me to go back to driving trucks? Give me a good reason to do so. ...
...
It surely cannot be too much to ask of a town/city to provide facilities for those who are doing so much to make sure their economies run and their shops and businesses are stocked with supplies.
What he's effectively asking for is a subsidy of the trucking industry, on top of the effective subsidy that already exists when we take into account that trucks pay relatively little towards the upkeep of the road network.
I fully understand and sympathise with his other argument, that truck drivers in the UK are treated badly, paid badly, but it means that the trucking industry relies on either having a state subsidy or exploiting truck drivers. Either way it seems the economic case for using trucks as opposed to rail is not as clear as was presented.
But fortunately there's someone else to blame:
...because of the influx of foreign drivers willing to work for a wage that is high where they come from...
There were ways to avoid this specific situation but the UK chose not to bother. It's always easier to blame someone else...