Deaths when not using helmet

[Little yellow Brompton]

My point is that this thread was supposed to be about deaths when not using helmets, not about taking the opportunity to jump on someone and try to take them to task about every dot and comma or every word which you obviously don't understand the various meanings of, you have taken this thread away from its origin in a vain attempt to show how clever you were, and how dumb you presumed I was, now do you understand.

Careful , your chip is showing.

 

[benb]

My point is that this thread was supposed to be about deaths when not using helmets, not about taking the opportunity to jump on someone and try to take them to task about every dot and comma or every word which you obviously don't understand the various meanings of, you have taken this thread away from its origin in a vain attempt to show how clever you were, and how dumb you presumed I was, now do you understand.

Oh I have, have I?

Who put you in charge of what is and isn't appropriate content for this thread?

 

[twobiker]

Oh I have, have I?

Who put you in charge of what is and isn't appropriate content for this thread?

You can post whatever you like but if that means "Part" quoting me in an attempt to show what a smartass you are then expect me to take exception to it , just to help you out though maybe the content might be something to do with Deaths when not using helmet, you were obviously looking for the thread called "Lets read the posts and pick on people.

 

[benb]

You can post whatever you like but if that means "Part" quoting me in an attempt to show what a smartass you are then expect me to take exception to it , just to help you out though maybe the content might be something to do with Deaths when not using helmet, you were obviously looking for the thread called "Lets read the posts and pick on people.

I think you're paranoid, and need to grow up a bit.

 

[Angelfishsolo]

I think you're paranoid, and need to grow up a bit.

 

[twobiker]

Careful , your chip is showing.

Its just such an honour to be able to come up to the big house and talk to the posh folks sometimes, we feel proper proud ,maybe we can catch some of the crumbs of wisdom that fall from the top table.

 

[dellzeqq]

is there a Flat Helmet Society?

 

[Little yellow Brompton]

Its just such an honour to be able to come up to the big house and talk to the posh folks sometimes, we feel proper proud ,maybe we can catch some of the crumbs of wisdom that fall from the top table.

There doesn't seem to be any "we" , just you.

If you can't cope with a debate about science, using terms as used in science, rather than whingeing about being talked down to maybe you would be better off learning how to use the terms , or possibly not getting involved? Of the three options, learning would seem the best all round , not joining in the most popular and whingeing the least likely to convince anyone.

 

[Angelfishsolo]

is there a Flat Helmet Society?

You could start one.

 

[Red Light]

Here's one I made earlier

 

[Angelfishsolo]

Here's one I made earlier

It looks comfortable at the very least

 

[david k]

, not about taking the opportunity to jump on someone and try to take them to task about every dot and comma or every word

Seems to happen on helmet threads more so than others. Its a shame that most of these discussions descend into tit for tat, I for one have tried to keep it on track but i'm not convinced all posters true intentions are on show. You've been called paranoid for this, no doubt so will I, however I maintain my view on helmets and helmet posters, no page after page of multi quotes, patronizing replies and childish off topic tit for tat will make me change my thoughts on this. If this leads to people thinking or posting MTFU, it all depends on what people think manning up is. Picking holes in grammar or dealing with semantics and trying to be a WUM on a forum is hardly manning up in my opinion.

 

[Little yellow Brompton]

Seems to happen on helmet threads more so than others. Its a shame that most of these discussions descend into tit for tat, I for one have tried to keep it on track but i'm not convinced all posters true intentions are on show. You've been called paranoid for this, no doubt so will I, however I maintain my view on helmets and helmet posters, no page after page of multi quotes, patronizing replies and childish off topic tit for tat will make me change my thoughts on this.

Of course you won't change your belief , it was formed without facts , so is impervious to them. Religions are often like that.

 

[david k]

Of course you won't change your belief , it was formed without facts , so is impervious to them. Religions are often like that.

I presume from your reply that this is in contrast to your views, were your views formed with facts alone?


and thank you for proving my point on 'some posters on helmet threads' for me, mentioning religion when i didnt

 

[Little yellow Brompton]

I presume from your reply that this is in contrast to your views, were your views formed with facts alone?


and thank you for proving my point on 'some posters on helmet threads' for me, mentioning religion when i didnt

Of course my views are based on facts, it's a rational view, any other is based upon belief!


As for not mentioning religion " I maintain my view on helmets and helmet posters, no page after page of multi quotes, patronizing replies and childish off topic tit for tat will make me change my thoughts on this."

If you won't change your thoughts you are not being rational, if you are holding a belief and do not rely on rational thought then it's as close to religion as makes no difference.