Cyclist wins case against Taxi driver

Status
Not open for further replies.
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

bladesman73

Über Member
Ok, you tell me: how many times can you flounce out of a thread before you have to stay out?
i cannot ignore stupidity so please forgive me. this thread needs bottling up and nominating for the 'how many posters can miss the point' award
 
I suppose this balances out the London one, I think it was on Southwark Bridge where a cabbie nearly killed a cyclist then drove after him and drove into him. The cabbie walked after saying he just wanted to have a word to "See what was wrong". The jury found not guilty so presumably think it's safe to drive close to a cyclist and shout at them.
 

Tim Hall

Guest
Location
Crawley
Out of interest, who among those who criticise the cyclist has cycled on roads with tramlines like that? Do you think the rider's positioning was incorrect?
Having rewatched the video, that road layout is truly awful. Crossing tramlines at a shallow angle, merging lane coming in from the left. All of which exonerates the taxi driver, obviously. The man's a living saint, so he is.
 
Having rewatched the video, that road layout is truly awful. Crossing tramlines at a shallow angle, merging lane coming in from the left. All of which exonerates the taxi driver, obviously. The man's a living saint, so he is.

Dodgy as hell, first you have to take the lane where it becomes one lane but at the same time you've got to get the angle of crossing the lines dead right or it's goodbye front teeth. If anything his angle was a bit shallow, they scare the hell out of me after an incident in Amsterdam.
 

bladesman73

Über Member
You don't have to stop posting, but you chose to flounce. Don't do that if you don't mean to leave.

You still haven't addressed this. Please let me know how many times I have to ask the same question to get an answer.
i think i have made my interpretation of the video clear in my many posts tonight. i cannot help you if you fail to grasp that.
 
Out of interest, who among those who criticise the cyclist has cycled on roads with tramlines like that? Do you think the rider's positioning was incorrect?
The positioning looks as good as it can be to me. I grew up in Melbourne, and learned (late in life) to cycle there. Melbourne's tram infrastructure is not perfect - I find myself in the door zone much more than I would be in London. eg here https://goo.gl/maps/hLx9ocKYGQ22

But they seem to have got stops in the CBD right. https://goo.gl/maps/Qdba7un3cwn
 
Seriously dodgy, you're parallel then you have to swing over quite sharply. Gives me the heebie jeebies. Then you've got Mr Explodey Aorta trying to climb into your frigging pocket.
 

bladesman73

Über Member
Why bother with the first verbal altercation? After all, your Kenneth Noye type might kill you then. Surely just apologising for having got in their way might be the better option.
deary me...you lot are trying to wind me up surely? lolz
 

glasgowcyclist

Charming but somewhat feckless
Location
Scotland
thanks for that, do you have anything constructive to say or are you one of those people who go looking for trouble? driver passed close, cyclist gave him a rollocking, he needed to grow up and leave it, .....

MOD Edited

That was as constructive as your post deserved.

But to spell it out for you...

Every part of your post was nonsense. There were insults traded, reasonably by the cyclist as he'd suffered a nasty and frightening close pass. Nothing the cyclist said or did warranted the calculated, premeditated violence from the driver. Nothing.

The rider did not pursue the driver, who'd gone well out of sight before setting up his ambush.

Lastly, one guy's behaviour on a bike is not representative of any other person on a bike. We are not, as a group, collectively responsible for every other rider.

The court, with all of the evidence available to it, decided the driver was guilty of assault. The judge must have been thoroughly unimpressed by his driving since he gave the cabbie the maximum penalty points available, 9. I've never before heard of 9 points for careless driving. With any luck he'll clock up another 3 in short order and the courts will disqualify him. He has no place on our roads.

GC
 

Origamist

Legendary Member
The road layout with the tram tracks look hazardous - particularly in the wet - I can imagine quite a few cyclists will be hitting the deck.

Without the physical altercation, the driver would have got away scot-free for a miserable piece of driving. It's one thing to pass too close, but another to pass too close when there is a chance the cyclist might come off his bike. 9 points is thoroughly deserved.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom