JCVI Doesn't Recommend COVID-19 Jabs for All 12 to 15-year-olds
However, it is widening the limited roll out to at-risk groups. Children with chronic major heart, lung, kidney, liver, and neurological conditions will now be offered vaccination. Around 200,000 more children will be invited for jabs.
JCVI: "The health benefits from vaccination are marginally greater than the potential known harms. However, the margin of benefit is considered too small to support universal vaccination of healthy 12 to 15-year-olds at this time.
"It is not within the JCVI’s remit to consider the wider societal impacts of vaccination, including educational benefits. The Government may wish to seek further views on the wider societal and educational impacts from the Chief Medical Officers of the UK four nations."
The JCVI is under strict remit. The MHRA have cleared specific vaccines for use in 12-15s. I guess the government is grappling with the judgement calls (as flagged by JCVI above) of vaccinating 12-15s (and the implications for sufficient supply as a 'third dose' programme rolls out nationwide) without the support of a JCVI recommendation.
So it'll be down to CMOs x 4 to consider the societal benefits of having children vaccinated, and focus on areas outside the JCVI’s remit: including lost education time due to COVID-related absences (either infection or proximity-driven rustication).