Coronavirus outbreak

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

tom73

Guru
Location
Yorkshire
If Boris has the the right data then Vallance and Whitty must be reading them upside down then. Over the past few day's they both have made it clear they don't see things the same as Boris. The last few day's have also made it clear as mud that the government scientists and the government no longer see eye to eye on anything. Even the "The guided by science" message Boris publicly dumped yesterday.
 

marinyork

Resting in suspended Animation
Location
Logopolis
Possible? Theoretically? Really?

The mental equivalent for Boris of in the cellar, in the dark, with no stairs and a sign beware of the leopard. All the while magic thighs cummings his chief adviser telling him that he demands a total absence of solid facts.
 

Slick

Guru
I’ve no doubt Johnson has access to the data and to advisers. It’s what he chooses to do with the information and who‘s best interests he has in mind when he makes his decisions is what I call into question
Of that there is no doubt, which is why I said it's up to us to ensure we don't become one of his acceptable statistics. :okay:
 

srw

It's a bit more complicated than that...
I’ve no doubt Johnson has access to the data and to advisers. It’s what he chooses to do with the information and who‘s best interests he has in mind when he makes his decisions is what I call into question
The thing is that I rather doubt he has access to any more information than the rest of us. Throughout this crisis it's been clear that government information has been shockingly poor at best.

Outside the ONS, which is doing a very good job and which is very transparent, we seem to be incapable as a country of combining information from multiple sources in a reliable way. The revelation this week that PHE has been misrecording cause of death is just the latest example.

You add to that the fact that Johnson has given up even pretending to listen to advisors who might give him information he doesn't like and I'm more convinced than ever that he's winging it using publicly available information.

Getting good data isn't a tricky job if you go about in the right way. You need people who are able to specify data precisely and who have the balls and the clout to make data suppliers provide it. And you need data suppliers who are culturally attuned enough and who have enough resource capacity to collect it well and supply it on time.

Despite throwing billions at furlough and loan schemes we don't seem to have bothered spending the mere millions good quality information would cost.
 

Rezillo

TwoSheds
Location
Suffolk
The revelation this week that PHE has been misrecording cause of death is just the latest example.

I believe the statistical consequences of that will turn out to be minor; the political ones another matter.

If large numbers of people testing positive had later died of non-covid causes unassociated with their infection, then their deaths would not be part of the excess death figures but just those of people who would have died anyway, be it car crash, heart conditions, accidents or whatever. Establishing statistical links to flu or in this case covid, is one of the major reasons for compiling excess death figures in the first place, especially where deaths occur outside a hospital environment. In the case of flu, naff-all testing is done outside hospitals but we still accept the thousands of deaths recorded to other conditions during a flu season as caused by flu simply based on the stats.

The excess death figures track the covid figures in proportion remarkably well, indicating the majority of excess deaths are related to covid in some way.
 

roubaixtuesday

self serving virtue signaller
The revelation this week that PHE has been misrecording cause of death

Hardly a revelation. It's been known about and discussed for weeks and cannot have anything more than a minor impact.
 

Bromptonaut

Rohan Man
Location
Bugbrooke UK
Possible? Theoretically? Really?

It's possible, but by no means certain, that government has access to more data than is published. Knowing stuff and not publishing absent considerations such as National Security looks very much like concealment for party advantage and will come back and bite. My primary point however is that Johnson's entire history is of somebody with no time for detail or the intricacies of actually delivering the broad brush waffle piffle that characterises his public utterances.

See the 'Oven Ready' Brexit deal or the London Garden Bridge.
 

srw

It's a bit more complicated than that...
The excess death figures track the covid figures in proportion remarkably well, indicating the majority of excess deaths are related to covid in some way.

Absolutely. I've probably said something like this before in the thread. The only reliable indicator of how many people have been killed by the pandemic is total all cause excess mortality.

Here, courtesy of the CMI of the UK actuarial profession, is the best illustration of what's been happening.

536742



Hardly a revelation. It's been known about and discussed for weeks
Really? I follow this sort of thing quite closely for professional reasons, and I don't remember hearing about it. I could have missed it, of course. I didn't mean to cite it as an example of a meaningful problem with a useful statistic - the PHE data is only useful as a broad trend indicator - but as an example of the woeful lack of care with which data collection has been treated in the crisis.
 
Top Bottom