I've no idea what the criteria will be. I'm saying there's a huge difference between something that up to 25 million people are eligible for and is tried and tested and minor screw ups happen every year and something where if there is a vaccine this year it's likely to be very limited.
The criteria on age could be something like over 80s or 85s or those in care home settings. That's still big numbers. Once the metaphorical Michael Gove's daughter and all and sundry in the elite are bunged jabs and you have ICU staff, some other hospital staff, some care workers that's it, all gone. Then you've got the tsunami of other public sector workers sometimes which it's hard to quantify risk that there will be infinite demand for.
If you had an antibody test that preceded the jab, that also complicates matters and makes it a difficult decision. These are things that require a lot of thought and planning by government. I've not seen any discourse on it, but do you give the jab to men at a lower age than women as they appear for whatever reason (and endless discussion on this) to be more likely to admitted to ICU and more likely to die? How do we encourage ethnic minorities to get the jab and ensure it is fairly supplied?
), psychological effects of lockdown, Operation #EtAprés? ("AndAfterwards?") asking what should change after lockdown
Edit2: it's not rtl2's main stream but another on 6play.fr
