With respect, I'll go with the WHO and a whole cohort of experts in epidemiology than unreferenced pieces written by The Spectator and the Irish Times
People who seek to suggest that the risk has been overstated point to China and say that they have it under control with only a couple of thousand deaths. That's true. But China is uniquely placed to have the political system and resources to lock down a whole nation.
Hmmmm, you say that you respect the data from the WHO and experts in epidemiology, but then say you believe information on infection and death rate provided by the Chinese Government, that bastion of free speech and open discussion. The whole reason that the risk cannot be better calculated is due to :
- China being a primary source of information.
- China having a massively high population density
- China having a very high proportion of elderly citizens.