@Mugshot @Pale Rider
The big problem with McD and employment ever since the early days. Is it's wide use of the franchise model so not one big solution and unpicking who your employer is and who is responsible for what. They don't have a great record with government payout. When Cameron did the old "look we have big names backing key skills education for workers". They handed over funding some payed for staff if they went on courses. McD pocketed it and spent it on in house training.
I happen to have some level of experience with McDs, my son works there as does his partner.
My son is on an 8 hour contract, he has worked for McDs for years and throughout that time has, on a number of occasions, asked that they put him on a contract that reflects the hours he actually works, full time, they haven't and wouldn't. He has worked his way through various rungs of the McD management ladder and was about to get his promotion to become a salaried member of management, however, due to the situation the final part of the training program was cancelled and his promotion suspended, so he remains on an 8 hour contract. His girlfriend is on a zero hour contract, despite having worked full time hours virtually since she started around 2 years ago.
Currently, as I understand it, if you are on a zero hour contract (or any other) there is not an entitlement to 80% of your average earnings over any time frame, but I would be interested in knowing for certain. If you don't know the answer, as indeed was eventually revealed, "friends" that are happy on zero hour, McDs coffee being really quite tasty or the implication that there is a lack of research on my part are, with all due respect, irrelevant.