Coronavirus outbreak

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
It really hacked me off when a friend callously disregarded the deaths of very old Covid victims (over 80's in their words) as having 'had their life'.

Presumably he will jump off of a cliff edge on his 80th birthday if he should reach that milestone.
The thing is - with all of us, but especially with people like that - 'very old' is a moveable point. It has a very different definition when one is 20, to the definition it has when one is 40, or 70 ...
But that also means none of us can decide - in such a flippant way - when, or if, it's acceptable for other people to die of something preventable!
 

Ajax Bay

Guru
Location
East Devon
That’s terrible. If Australian government hadn’t done what they have many elderly & obese elderly would have died. It hacks me off when they say Omicron is just a cold. It may be weaker but more transmitted so can kill high risk folks nearly as much as Delta.
Do people say 'Omicron is just a cold'? Or is that a strawman within a sealion? The case fatality rate cf Delta is way, way less (see my graphs up thread), so the threat of death from this variant (cf Delta) is NOT anywhere "nearly as much" especially in the fully vaccinated. As a community we can take that into account in the way we conduct ourselves and our interactions with others once the high case rate has plummeted. Reasonable people, if they have a bad cold say, will stay away from aged relatives/friends or others with vulnerabilities. This is no different but we'll need to get used to taking more care.
 

Johnno260

Veteran
Location
East Sussex
It may be as GBN did a piece and basically said 17k people died of Covid and that had no underlying health issues, I'm seeing that news story shared a lot today in the usual places.

I said you can't disregard a death with an underlying issue, some could be long term chronic issues that someone could live with for an extended period of time, it wouldn't include anyone with cardiovascular issues etc epilepsy as well.

It's a very dishonest way to present data, the host tried to claim this 17k were the only legitimate deaths, I was seething after seeing it.
 

mjr

Comfy armchair to one person & a plank to the next
I took it that they were trying to distinguish between deaths in people with co-morbidity and deaths in those who were deemed to be in “normal health” (whatever that might mean).

This distinction because if someone has other health conditions which impact their body’s ability to fight COVID then that might affect the proportion of people in that group for whom the infection proves fatal.
I humbly suggest that anyone interested in that would probably distinguish between deaths in people with health conditions which impact the body’s ability to fight COVID and other deaths.

For example, none of my illnesses affect my covid survival as far as I know, which is why I was vaccinated with my age group and not classed as any sort of vulnerable, but if I did die from it, some scum would dismiss my death as a coffin-dodger with multiple illnesses not worth worrying about if it means they might have to spend any effort being careful to reduce the spread the virus.
 

mjr

Comfy armchair to one person & a plank to the next
[...] Everyone is going to catch Omicron this year, [...]
That is almost certainly not true. There was a great illustration of why not in the second of last year's Royal Institution Christmas Lectures with the "gigantic game of lucky dip". https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0012tz5

Some will escape. It may not be many. It may not even be a good thing for them, if next winter's variant is worse and past Omicron infection offers some immunity. But probably not everyone will catch Omicron this year.
 
As it now seems to have passed it's peak, and normality looks more and more likely, I wonder if there'll be a study to estimate the harm to people when they suddenly find they need something else to worry about?
 

PK99

Legendary Member
Location
SW19
It really hacked me off when a friend callously disregarded the deaths of very old Covid victims (over 80's in their words) as having 'had their life'.

Presumably he will jump off of a cliff edge on his 80th birthday if he should reach that milestone.

But, one has to note the difference from the 1918 Flu pandemic where there was a major peak in age of death around 20/30 - including my paternal grandparents. Only over the past two years, as I have looked into this, have I realised just how many orphanages there were in Liverpool in the 1920's - my dad and his 4 sibs were each in separate orphanages and there were many more. The 1918 age profile was far more tragic than the current pandemic.
 

mjr

Comfy armchair to one person & a plank to the next
As it now seems to have passed it's peak, and normality looks more and more likely, I wonder if there'll be a study to estimate the harm to people when they suddenly find they need something else to worry about?
More than enough problems still exist in the world if you like living in fear, from climate change to that classic fear of communism.
 
Top Bottom