lane
Veteran
How do those under the age of 12(at present) manage. They'll not be vaccinated under current rules.
Under the age of 18 under current rules!
How do those under the age of 12(at present) manage. They'll not be vaccinated under current rules.
Herd immunity imo implies people become immune by catching and recovering from the virus.
Fully vaccinated and protected is the way out of this crisis..maybe semantics but thats different to herd immunity.
Pfizer vaccine is approved for use on kids down to the age of 12. Nothing available so far for below the age of 12.Under the age of 18 under current rules!
Pfizer vaccine is approved for use on kids down to the age of 12. Nothing available so far for below the age of 12.
Herd immunity imo implies people become immune by catching and recovering from the virus.
Fully vaccinated and protected is the way out of this crisis..maybe semantics but thats different to herd immunity.
Herd immunity imo implies people become immune by catching and recovering from the virus.
Fully vaccinated and protected is the way out of this crisis..maybe semantics but thats different to herd immunity.
Medieval Europeans acquired immunity of a sort to flu and other viruses. This became evident when the Spanish invaded South America and took their diseases with them.Herd immunity is normally used to include both naturally and vaccine acquired immunity.
There is not a single example of her immunity being acquired solely through natural infection.
Given the R number seems to increase with every variant, a proportion won' t be vaccinated, vaccines are not 100% effective and people infected get re infected, immunity decreases over time and new variants will be able to evade to an extent previously aquired immunity, it seems that herd immunity may well never be achieved.
I responded (on 12 Jun):
"Reworking, adding in the already vaccinated as @McWobble suggested.
10% (basis for that estimate shared upthread) chance that those susceptible will catch it. The average fraction of those that catch it who end up in hospital is 1% (another assumption which I'm not certain is robust, but I've seen quoted), Spread over 30 days (see previous 'model') 30 days either side of peak that'd suggest (planning figures) = 580pd, peaking at (estimate) 1160pd. (NB Latest figure (12 Jun) is 187pd on 8 Jun and the peak in January was 4,232pd (7-day average).)
To reiterate: "Put it this way, it's not going to be in the thousands, and the NHS can handle it (see Test 2).
[By all means flag these analyses and use them as a stick to beat me in late August.]"
Quoting @McWobble “if the hospitalisation fraction for the vaccinated really is 1% of those who become ill, I'd expect total numbers to be 10-15% lower than my above figure [“a peak of 4,800 hospitalisations per day.”]”
My estimate was a peak of 1160pd. I had not referred to herd immunity in my estimates.
28 Jun: How are we going? They seem to have stopped publishing hospital admissions: last data are 227 on 22 Jun: a steady increase of about 3 per day (UK).
The policies on air pollution and so on are mostly pretty good, but unimplemented and unenforced except for a few groups dragging government through the courts.I have never been in any doubt that this government will prioritise the economy over my health (consider policies on air pollution, climate change etc.)