Good morning,
I expect to be told that I don't understand how dangerous COVID is, that I don't understand the risks and I think I know the level of abuse that is about to come my way, but I feel that we have long gone past the point where we should be seeing people breaking restrictions as automatically in the wrong.
We should be really trying to understand and address the issues and motivations behind this behaviour and this includes changing our owns minds and saying that yes, actually their actions are reasonable.
The government supported by the media has succeeded in a very successful "divide and conquer" campaign, by offering salary support schemes around 70%-85% of the population has been pretty much unaffected financially over the last 10 months.
Which does of course mean that 15% to 30% have been left with little or no support.
I say 70%-85% because it is one of those numbers that is pretty much impossible to get the correct real world figures for as there are so many reasonable ways to do the counting.
It is very easy if you are one of those unaffected to get very judgemental when those who have been left high and dry for close on a year with their businesses closed and little or no financial support, do anything to try and pay their bills.
Typically the response on the lack of financial support has been that those who are unsupported or marginally supported are tax dodgers or similar who don't deserve any sympathy, rather than the reality.
And then they are told that they should suck up being closed for 10+ months without any income because it is for the good of the country.
During the closures in early 2020 you could even make a strong case for this, but with the number of people now working with official approval, the businesses that are left closed are mostly those that lack political power and are easy targets as their closure is not critical to those working or still not working but being paid anyway.
Keeping these businesses closed is politically useful as it creates an impression of a good strong government doing its best to control the situation and allows the government to keep power's that are "for the public good" even if these closures have little or no effect.
It makes it easy not to question the governments actions and the consequence of those actions because "I am a responsible person helping to prevent the spread of a genuinely harmful virus and this takes priority over everything else". Once you start asking what that "everything else" is and what those consequences are your priorities may change, or they may not.
Of the closed businesses I accept that the pub trade would have been expected to be politically powerful, but there is general public support by those having their salary paid by the government or are allowed to work, that they are getting grants anyway so its no real loss anyway and "oh, it's not my business/job".
There is a little piece by a wet-led pub owner here
https://www.morningadvertiser.co.uk...bs-trade-successfully-with-Covid-restrictions which also addresses this issue.
Bye
Ian