You can remember Florence Nightingale? ...Going way back to my student days, didn't Florence Nightingale use ...
You can remember Florence Nightingale? ...Going way back to my student days, didn't Florence Nightingale use ...
More than 30 virus restriction breaches in Birmingham on a single night.
Given that the clear up rate for minor crime is under 10%, it's a reasonable inference to draw there were hundreds of other breaches which were not detected.
Neither should Birmingham be regarded as breach hotspot - we just happened to have been told about the situation there.
Chances are the same is happening in towns and cities across the country.
All of which I reckon adds up to significant non-compliance.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-55786863
Assuming you're correct. - what action do you think should be taken to enforce complaince ?
Most realistic options are being taken already.
The coppers have recently started to nick more people publicly, urging the public to comply continues, and it looks like the fines for more egregious breaches are being increased.
I'd be tempted to lock up a few, but that's difficult given the offences are non-imprisonable.
The situation does indicate why the claims of mis-management by the government are so wide of the mark.
Ultimately, the rules will not work if the public choose to ignore them, no matter how cleverly those rules are thought out.
Credit to Hancock this morning. On a not-as-annoying-as-usual video interview with Marr today, he stuck to the above line. I do wonder how long he can stick to that line before Number 10 press office orders him to stop upsetting people.
And we finally got a view of his office that makes it look less like he is in a downstairs loo!
Most people comply with the rules.
https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19...ince-first-lockdown-new-data-reveals-12186138
It's a tempting narrative to believe that individual rule breaking is the problem, but it just doesn't seem to be the driver.
Rather:
The rules are too lax. Compared to licorice one: Far more children are allowed in school. Far more people are at work.
An exception: There is a whole swathe of people for whom isolating means poverty and hunger. Unsurprisingly, this is where compliance is low, and enforcement will not merely fail, but actively harm the response - these people will just choose not to be tested.
No one has ever said we have 100% complaince.
Therefore the 30 incidents in Birmingham (population 2m ???) Are well within the 8% of suggested non compliance. Indeed as @Pale Rider says there were probably more..taking us a tad closer to the 8% non compliance...how close ..who knows.
Rather than bigger fines I'd like to see increased detection -if people know they have reasonable chance of being caught fined they are more likely to comply.
Funny story -friend of my son's actually has covid -was that hacked off with being ill -he started to get the music vibes , louder, louder , it went ....he got a knock on the door ...they thought he was having a party 😂🤣
I'm not against detection and enforcement, but it needs to be in context.
Context being that London/Dubai has been allowed to become the busiest air route in the world, and 40% of kids are in primary school.
All the evidence us that lack of compliance is not what is driving the epidemic, except for people who can't afford to comply.