Surely like the original lockdown they will ask local gp's who has whatever is an issue.I've heard that they'll look (illegally) at our medical records and decide if we should or shouldn't be placed under house arrest.
Surely like the original lockdown they will ask local gp's who has whatever is an issue.I've heard that they'll look (illegally) at our medical records and decide if we should or shouldn't be placed under house arrest.
The news article @Accy cyclist quoted suggested that all over 50s would be given an individual risk rating potentially adding to the list of those that were originally shielding. What it didn't say was how the risk rating would be worked out and what you would be mandated to do with the information. So, I guess, those over 50s who were originally shielding due to being extremely clinically vulnerable would be expected to do so again for starters and then they would look at the others. So . . . potentially points for being male, BAME, obese, type 2 diabetes, high bp/cholesterol mild to moderate asthma/COPD etc. Since many over 50s are walking round with some of these conditions without knowing or having ever visited a GP, it is unworkable without giving all over 50s a medical.This over 50’s thing seems strange. Surely if someone over 50 is particularly vulnerable they’d have been isolating already. Are they going to ask any obese people regardless of age to isolate?
You can offer it but if people have not saved for that to be their plan, it's not going to be possible.The sensible thing to do would be to offer early retirement to the over 60s initially, see the uptake and use this to keep the younger less vulnerable in jobs. Then look at options for the over 50s.
In your opinion.You can offer it but if people have not saved for that to be their plan, it's not going to be possible.
They asked GP's!Surely like the original lockdown they will ask local gp's who has whatever is an issue.
…...or was it merely rectifying a grotesquely unjust sexist policy that discriminated against males....?After all it would also resolve the women forced into working past their initial retirement age, which was an injustice in itself.
Just listening to a jumped up busybody on the local radio phone in saying he asked a security guard in a supermarket to challenge a couple about not wearing masks. He said the guard refused to,saying he didn't have any power to stop and ask. The caller then said "so i went and challenged them,but they told me to keep my f..k..g nose out". I think i would've said the same to this idiot! The other day in a home fittings store while talking to a friend,a woman looked at me and shook her head,most likely because i wasn't wearing a mask. "That's it,shake your head" i said quite loudly.
I'm not 100% certain,but i don't think it's compulsory to wear masks in stores. I have to when visiting the dentist quite a lot at the moment,but i think that'll be because of medical reasons. Correct me if i'm wrong!I know for a fact that the place where I am makes it mandatory to wear a mask. I'll say something like "Excuse me but do you realize this store requires everyone to wear a mask?"
I'm not 100% certain,but i don't think it's compulsory to wear masks in stores. I have to when visiting the dentist quite a lot at the moment,but i think that'll be because of medical reasons. Correct me if i'm wrong!
The requirement to wear one in stores/shops is there, but it's a legal requirement. This means that shop staff can't actually make you wear one, nor can store security.I refrain from calling people out unless I know for a fact that the place where I am makes it mandatory to wear a mask. I'll say something like "Excuse me but do you realize this store requires everyone to wear a mask?" If they get beligerant I'll look at them and say "You might want to collect your things and go pay for what you are buying because you won't be in this store for very long." But again, I wouldn't do that unless I know the store will do something about it. If I know they won't do anything about it, then I just keep my mouth shut. But if I see that person doing something that puts others in danger, I'll definitely open my mouth.
The requirement to wear one in stores/shops is there, but it's a legal requirement. This means that shop staff can't actually make you wear one, nor can store security.