Accy cyclist
Legendary Member
- Location
- The hills of Accrington
I take out. What do you mean by that?
celebs
- Thread starter clid61
- Start date
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Accy cyclist
Legendary Member
- Location
- The hills of Accrington
We've done that one before,so unfortunately you're not funny!
winjim
Smash the cistern
No, you calling him thick is important because it reveals your biases. Now you are calling him a robber which is a pretty strong accusation. Can you back it up?
If the system says they are entitled to it, then they are entitled to it. Now the system may have been belatedly and hurriedly put together, meaning that there will be huge discrepancies and imbalances in who gets what and who doesn't, but that's not their fault. You compared them to Captain Moore. Bear in mind that the people who put together the system which allows the Beckhams to furlough their employees are the same people who have underfunded the health service to the point where a 99 year old man is walking lengths of his garden to raise money to support its staff.
Jenkins
Legendary Member
- Location
- Felixstowe
While not wishing to endorse the Daily Mail (and not having clicked the link), you are aware that this is the same Daily Mail that is currently being sued by the former royal couple and one of the tabloids that have just been told that they will not be co-operating with? No agenda at all behind the story is there @Accy cyclist
Mugshot
Cracking a solo.
And you've mentioned Beckham before so...
Accy cyclist
Legendary Member
- Location
- The hills of Accrington
Yeah,thank god they're a former royal couple!
Accy cyclist
Legendary Member
- Location
- The hills of Accrington
I didn't do the comparison. That was in the headline to the story.
winjim
Smash the cistern
Which you posted here and which appeared in massive bold type. You brought that comparison into the discussion.
Accy cyclist
Legendary Member
- Location
- The hills of Accrington
If they have then that's bad. Just as bad as rich football clubs,'celebrities' doing it with their housekeeper and gardener (not 'Becks' this time,but some other plank) and anyone else doing it who can afford to not do it! Didn't the government think this system would be open to legalised abuse when they introduced it?!I wonder if the owners of the Daily Mail have applied to furlough staff despite being fabulously wealthy (as the owners of the express are?)
Accy cyclist
Legendary Member
- Location
- The hills of Accrington
Yeah,but i still didn't say it. I just used the bold headline,because it was there. Maybe i should've deleted bits of it,but then that'd be censorship.
Jenkins
Legendary Member
- Location
- Felixstowe
Not forgetting that Viscount Rothermere is also a non-dom so not liable for taxation in the UK with the paper owned by offshore trusts.I wonder if the owners of the Daily Mail have applied to furlough staff despite being fabulously wealthy (as the owners of the express are despite also slagging off the Beckhams?)
Accy cyclist
Legendary Member
- Location
- The hills of Accrington
Then there's that @#!! in Monaco who robbed his employees pension(only paying half of it back)fund to prop up his other financial interests and buy his wife another yacht!
Accy cyclist
Legendary Member
- Location
- The hills of Accrington
Just thought i'd show you this one.I wonder if the owners of the Daily Mail have applied to furlough staff despite being fabulously wealthy (as the owners of the express are despite also slagging off the Beckhams?)
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2...gh-100-non-editorial-staff-due-to-coronavirus
Mind you,they have been asking for financial donations when you click the link to the Guardian, for quite a while,so i'm thinking they're in a bit of a financial quagmire.