Reynard
Guru
- Location
- Cambridgeshire, UK
I knew Dr Reynard wouldn't let me down
There is advantage to being a nerd and having lots of books.
I knew Dr Reynard wouldn't let me down
The 100NX was an odd one. Pretty much a Sunny with a different body plonked atop. The 1.6 wasn't bad, but was spoiled by the horrible electronically controlled carburettor. It was a bit of a let down after the N13 Sunny Coupe.
Yep. Spanning the early 50s through to the early 60s.
Kieft used the engine in their F3 cars (driven by Stirling Moss), as did Lotus. Kieft also built climax-engined lightweight sportscars and took several class wins at Le Mans.
At the time, F1 was also a 1.5 litre formula, and Climax engines have the distinction of powering the first win by a rear-engined F1 car (a Rob-Walker-run Cooper driven by Moss in 1958), and thence also powering Jack Brabham to the first ever driver's championship won in a rear-engined car a year later.
As I am getting older I have had - and before that my Dad had - quite a few cars
is it weird that I know the reg number of all of them - not all of my Dad's but most from when I started Secondary school until I left home???
on a side note - when I was seriously depressed and all that - one of the symptoms I noticed was that I forgot all the reg numbers of these cars
Yes indeed! It was designed as a water pump motor, which meant it had to run flat out from stone cold and run reliably at high revs for long periods. This meant the Coventry Climax engineers had to pay close attention to materials, tolerances, etc.
They pulled a blinder to be fair, other than being a on the the thirsty side for oil it was strong and powerful for its weight.
They were so chuffed they showed it off at one motor show or other and people thought, "aye aye, that'd make right sweet race engine" and it quickly ended up on the track. The engine was further developed for road and track, and if memory serves they had a go at designing a V8 version.
I'm not super au fait with the imp so don't know if the engine problems there were a result of cooling inadequacy of a result of shoving it at the back, because it worked well enough in other applications.
Interesting that a lot of folk like the Lancia Monte Carlo, renamed Montecarlo on the later models.
A very pretty thing and while not super quick it was still hairy chested fun. The brakes were dicey- on the series I cars they were well over servo'd and difficult to pilot in the wet without locking them up.
After hearing the complaints Lancia took it out of production for two years while they investigated the problem, only to solve it by removing the servo and leaving the model instead with virtually no brakes, a fix worthy of British Leyland.
The lights on the Imp were mounted too low to comply with regulations. This was realised late in the day as the car was nearing production so rather than do it properly and retool to make a new front panel Rootes instead slapped on taller springs to raise the cars height.
To be fair the Coventry Climax engine went pretty well considering it's origins driving a water pump for firefighting.
I seem to remember a lot of hilarity at the time. MG advertising slogan was "you can do it in an MG"the MGB and MGB GT whose headlights were too low for the US market and their suspension was raised accordingly
Freind has a nissan bluebird and loved it!
Was a bit of a tank but reliable I think?!