Noodley
Guest
Ok.
So you dont dispute that the cyclist is behaving in a manner lacking courtesy and consideration.
You dont dispute that this sort of behaviour just pees people off.
Your only objection is the assumption that the behaviour of one cyclist then opens up the right for others to be open to abuse and danger.
Can you clarify what "right for others to be open to abuse and danger" you are referring to.
If I were using a phone I would not need to slow down as I can continue to cycle at the speed I was travelling when using a phone without need to slow down. Whether this would piss drivers off I have no idea.
I dispute that the behaviour of the cyclist causes the drivers to be pissed off...they choose to be pissed off as they see it as their right to travel without being impeded.