A pavement parking odyssey

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Accy cyclist

Legendary Member
I'm getting less tolerant of this shizzle as I get older and would have been sorely tempted to kick the bike over.

To be kind of fair to the bike owner, he parks there most of the time and doesn't park his bike there if a car is already parked on the pavement. The car owner is more to blame as he/she must've parked up on seeing the bike.
 

BoldonLad

Not part of the Elite
Location
South Tyneside
As you can see, our route from car to flat was slightly blocked yesterday evening. My mutt went to the right as you look at the pics, I went to the left. A car then appeared from that road in the background. I panicked thinking mutt might run onto the road looking for me. The driver of the car held back while I made it back to the pavement and thankfully saw he was still on the grassed bit.

View attachment 704705

View attachment 704706

View attachment 704707

Shocking parking. Report it to Council, you have the photographs.

Shouldn’t dog have been on a lead?
 

BoldonLad

Not part of the Elite
Location
South Tyneside
It's only required to be under proper control. My Bruce is command-obedient and doesn't usually get walked on a lead.

What is required and what is responsible are not necessarily the same.

In this instance, the owner was expressing concern about the dog’s potential actions. Does that imply “close control”, or, “command-obedience”?

Was Accy walking your dog?
 
Last edited:

mjr

Comfy armchair to one person & a plank to the next
To be kind of fair to the bike owner, he parks there most of the time and doesn't park his bike there if a car is already parked on the pavement. The car owner is more to blame as he/she must've parked up on seeing the bike.
Still criminal to ride the bike onto the pavement and hardly unforseeable that criminal motorists park on pavements, so both to blame IMO. Crush both.
 
On the main road past our estate there was a Range Rover parked today - clearly not a local as he was parked fully on the road!!! (probably worried that going over the kerb onto the "grass" verge - mostly soil/mid - would damage his nice car!!!)

Problem is that this narrows the road to an extent that some people are not willing to "risk" passing if there is anything coming - actually there is plenty of room unless the traffic is a bus or lorry.
hence it cause congestion at busy time - even on a reasonably wide local main road

Start enforcing it and the road will jam up at rush hour!
Oh - and the bit that leads to most of our estate would be impossible - some people would LITERALLY have nowhere to park their car (except their driveway of course!!!!)
 
OP
OP
Drago

Drago

Legendary Member
Start enforcing it and the road will jam up at rush hour!
Oh - and the bit that leads to most of our estate would be impossible - some people would LITERALLY have nowhere to park their car (except their driveway of course!!!!)
My heart bleeds for them.

Not.

Footways are for people. I don't know why some car drivers struggle with that concept. Footways - people. Say it after me - footways, people. Easy, innit?

It's up to car drivers to park their cars safely and lawfully, even if that means they have a bit of a walk (and thats the issue, theyre allergic to walking.) It's not up to the rest of us to accommodate them.

Obstructing the footway to avoid obstructing the road is simply not acceptable. That's the car drivers problem, so what gives them the right to suddenly foist their problem off on pedestrians? Keep your problems to yourself, don't make them an SEP.

When I'm PM - surely any day now - there will be a £1000 car tax supplement for vehicles that are stored on the road. You can bet the problem will resolve itself right quick, much as it did in Tokyo prefecture when they effectively banned the ownership of cars (other than tiny Kei cars) unless the prospective purchaser could prove they had somewhere off road to store it.

These footway parkers wouldn't give a sheet if I bought a cow, sofa or a fridge and had nowhere to store them, and would bleat endlessly if I decided to store my fridge, sofa or cow in the road or on the footway, so why should we be any more solicitous towards them and their car storage problem?

I don't have a cow precisely because I have nowhere to keep it - clearly an olde fashioned concept these days.
 
Last edited:

Slick

Guru
My heart bleeds for them.

Not.

Footways are for people. I don't know why some car drivers struggle with that concept. Footways - people. It's up to car drivers to park their cars safely and lawfully, even if that means they have a bit of a walk (and thwts the issue, theyre allergic to walking.) It's not up to the rest of us to accommodate them.

Obstructing the footway to avoid obstructing the road is simply not acceptable. That's the cwr drivers problem, so what gives them the right to suddenly foist their problem off on pedestrians?

When I'm PM - surely any day now - there will be a £1000 car tax supplement for vehicles that are stored on the road. You can bet the problem will resolve itself right quick, much as it did in Tokyo prefecture when they effectively banned the ownership of cars (other than tiny Kei cars) unless the prospective purchaser could prove they had somewhere off road to store it.

These footway parkers wouldn't give a sheet if I bought a cow, sofa or a fridge and had nowhere to store them, and would bleat endlessly if I decided to store my fridge, sofa or cow in the road or on the footway, so why should we be any more solicitous towards them?

Obviously, that's what I meant. :laugh:
 

Oldhippy

Cynical idealist
In Japan if you live in a city and have a car you must (or at least when I lived there) had to have a space. No space no car. Had a mate spend a fortune on 24 car parks.
 
Top Bottom