links not working for meI think it's this one here - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...bEZ1NVctVTBVeFRqTmNVbGZnbXc&pli=1&hl=de#gid=0
links not working for meI think it's this one here - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...bEZ1NVctVTBVeFRqTmNVbGZnbXc&pli=1&hl=de#gid=0
It just did for me. I wonder whether you have to have your machine enabled to use Google Drive (which is where the spreadsheet I found is).links not working for me
no they don't.
Spend a bit of time finding out - a CCer has tabulated cycle deaths in London for about five years now.
I've read it. There's a lot of lorries involved! Doesn't say whether the cyclist rode up the side or not but as most of the debate on here is about exactly that, what is your point?
i can see where you and dellzeg are coming from, but until the behaviour of those doing the killing is addressed, then we have to look out for ourselves and each other. Its not victim blaming, its self preservation!The point is that most of the debate is a waste of time, as long as it is about the behaviour of the victims, and not about the behaviour of those who are doing the killing.
then we have to look out for ourselves and each other. Its not victim blaming, its self preservation!
i can see where you and dellzeg are coming from, but until the behaviour of those doing the killing is addressed, then we have to look out for ourselves and each other. Its not victim blaming, its self preservation!
Advising cyclists to take care around lorries is not victim-blaming. But responding to a report of a cyclist killed by a lorry by scrutinizing her behaviour and not that of the driver that killed her is victim-blaming. Some cyclists are extraordinarily careful, some are extraordinarily daft, most of us are somewhere in between. Everyone knows this. The drivers and operators of large and heavy vehicles are not entitled to kill any of them - even the really stupid ones.
Clearly from this statement i made earlier you can see i'm not victim blaming, what i am questioning is why some cyclists are still uneducated about the dangers of cycling up the sides of lorries?? and before i'm jumped on for "presuming she cycled up the side" this is because the witnesses said it.
"he should have seen her, she obviously knew he was turning left and decided to go up the outside not realising he would have to pull wide to make the turn. He may have been too busy looking for cyclists undertaking on the left side, if he knew there was a lane, not thinking a cyclist would overtake on the right. Cycle lanes should be abolished!! Cyclists should be in primary, not up the side of them where there is limited visibility. With the amount of deaths in London why are cyclists still taking chances round lorries? Why is word not getting to these cyclists?? I'm not blaming the cyclist, the lorry driver should look, but its self preservation! She is unlikely to recover properly, he has to live with what he's done. More needs to be done to educate both parties"
yes but no one on here is saying that the focus should be on the cyclist behaviour, we are simply saying that until such focus is duly placed where it should be, we need to look out for ourselves and each other bcoz the lorry driver is notMy previous post wasn't directed specifically at you, or the incident in the OP - which, we hope, the cyclist will survive and recover from. It's more about the depressing inevitability of the focus on victim behaviour, which will do nothing whatever to discourage the perpetrators. Lorries that are being driven dangerously or have inadequate safety measures are taking out cyclists irrespective of whether they are cycling unwisely or sensibly. As DZ points out above, buses have managed to accommodate the full range of cycling and pedestrian behaviour. Not killing people does not need to entail approving of their cycling habits - it doesn't matter if lorry driver mutters "f***ing muppet" when he sees someone squeezing up the inside at a junction, but he must see them - because he is about to move xx tonnes of lethal machinery across a space shared with vulnerable road users.