Thanks - the inside has been patched already; don't see much mileage in fitting one to the outside as the tread would make this difficult and I doubt it'd arrest the spread of the split..I had a get me home repair on my bike by cutting up a mineral water bottle to prevent the spare inner tube also blowing through a big gash hole. A good inner patch could just hold the outer together medium term.
More tyre drama meant the bike coming to bits again at the weekend.. took the opportunity to get a few photos in its can't-be-arsed-to-clean-it-again state..
Superficial rust after Tuesday's soaking ride home. Not sure if I've touched on this before but the sprocket setup is interesting; with the 16T item being thinner / with teeth of a more conventional asymmetric shape, the 13T being thicker / deeper / more pointy with a more traditional symmetrical form.
View attachment 721472
Hard to tell from these pics, but if anything the 13T item seems more worn; with the wear in the area of chain roller contact having now made its way across the entire width of the sprocket. Conventional wisdom states that these sprockets only last as long as one chain (which is a reasonable assumption, given their small size and higher duty cycle compared to cassettes with more speeds) - it'll be interesting to see if this holds true with the waxing regime.
Apparently later sprockets have a different format; with the 13T having similar thickness and tooth profile to the 16T... which I suspect might help with shifting.
Despite being magically coated and only around 650ish miles old, the KMC EPT chain is showing signs of rust.. this potentially suggests contamination; which would be a fair assumption given the amount of cack scraped off my chain wax puck this weekend.. although I suspect in the cleanest of conditions a relatively thin coating will wear of parts subject to friction eventually.
Brass bits are holding up well despite all the filth.
View attachment 721482
View attachment 721484
The witness mark from the rear wheel is an irritating reminder of how off-centre I got the plate on the BB; although also a satisfying indictment of what a good job it's doing in protecting the original finish.. I still haven't got around to applying any frame protection tape elsewhere.
View attachment 721483
In other news I also noticed that various other bits are starting to go rusty - including the brake pad bolts, caliper springs and mounting bolts - which is a bit crap considering how the bike only gets occasionally caught out in the rain and is otherwise stored in the dry. Yay for British quality
Anyway, naff all else to report, other than that the Brompton has now ticked over 1700 miles in my ownership and usurped the Fuji as "highest mileage hack"
I've heard several times now how the lacquered version is susceptible to going rusty, more so than the painted ones.
I think Brompton refers to this as patina.
Indeed; worryingly I've read the same (and seen some proper horror stories) but thankfully / finger's crossed the main frame on mine seems OK so far.
Unfortunately it seems that from the factory the in-frame corrosion protection is crap / non-existant (stuffing some way up all the tubes remains on the ever-growing to-do list). I'm glad I have the black edition since only the main frame has the coloured finish - while some parts that would be frame-coloured on standard models (the stem, fork home built projects and crucially and rear frame) are black.
This is important as these parts are apparently more likely to see damage that could serve as a corrosion initiation point (rubbing from folding, cable rub, damage from serrated axle washers all on parts that get covered in a lot of grit and crap in the wet) and the black finish seems more resileant, easier to touch up and ultimately the parts more common / easier to replace if the worst happens.
Unfortunately on a smaller / less serious scale the quality / material / finish of some of the components such as those mentioned in my last post just seems sub par / inappropriate. The hexagon inserts that retain the shifter / tensioner jockey wheels for example seem to be gun-blued - a nice finish in itself but abysmal from a corrosion-prevention perspective in an area that's likely to see and retain a lot of water.
I do love this bike but Brompton's attitude towards corrosion prevention from the perspectives of rust proofing, damage limitation and material choice / finish seems very poor
I know you can get Brommies made from titanium, but what about stainless? I do my homebuilt projects with this material, and they are holding up very well after a decade or so. Any blemish that does appear can be rubbed away with a kitchen scouring pad, real simple. Decent TIG welds are definitely on a par with braze welding as far as looks go, and equally as strong. There may well be a valid reason why stainless is not suitable for such a folder, would love to know if that's the case.
I would have thought that a premium brand like Brompton would already use stainless fasteners and small parts. As for special editions, isn't that usually Bromptonspeak for a normal range bike with a different shade of paint? (Dives for cover!).
Probably no Brompton after a few days of ownership remains standard. They all become "special editions" once they start to get modified/improved to suit their owner. Or is it just the ones that appear on forums like this?