Zwift Chat

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
13 rider

13 rider

Guru
Location
leicester
CXRAndy said:
Poor fella :laugh:

I know how it feels racing you lightweights - have a little sympathy for us heavyweights ;)


View: https://youtu.be/c4vapFfkdIw?si=hdH-YnycdrFq11Qo
Click to expand...

But looks at the maths ,he weighs twice what Andy Feather does but didn't take twice as long (apart from the lying down bit ) 😂 . Just think how quick he went down it
 
Whorty

Whorty

Gets free watts from the Atom ;)
Location
Wiltshire
CXRAndy said:
SIL. Did a little bit of analysis on my racing score. Though I'm bottom third for most power figures, my short term power is better than average. He thinks I'm destined to float around the boundary mark, but thinks I will never permanently drop into D, unless I lose my sprint top end- god forbid :biggrin:

Or Zwift move the boundaries -again :hello:
Click to expand...

The way they have built their algorithm I can see the majority of people floating around boundaries, thus no consistency over who we race week by week. People should be in a race cat and stay there UNLESS they are consistently too strong and get promoted, or too weak and get relegated. The majority of people should not be flitting between cats.
 
Whorty

Whorty

Gets free watts from the Atom ;)
Location
Wiltshire
13 rider said:
But looks at the maths ,he weighs twice what Andy Feather does but didn't take twice as long (apart from the lying down bit ) 😂 . Just think how quick he went down it
Click to expand...

An interesting test would be to add the 65kg on to Feather and see how he performs. I don't think he'd even get up the climb as his legs are noy used to pushing enough power to move that weight.

Or add helium balloons to the heavyweight to reduce his weight to 65kg - I'd like to try that haha
 
Whorty

Whorty

Gets free watts from the Atom ;)
Location
Wiltshire
CXRAndy said:
I found this this evening, is this what you're mentioning?

This was 4 days ago

https://forums.zwift.com/t/zwift-racing-score-update-november-18-2024/639491/212
Click to expand...

Interesting - thanks for sharing.

I wonder if all those across the various social media platforms who tried to shut the likes of me up when I said their model was farcical will acknowledge that I was correct, and Zwift re-writing their seed calculation proves that. To anyone with a maths background it was so obvious the model was poor.

I look forward to seeing the new seed numbers and ZRS scores to see if they have it better, but I'm remain sceptical until then.

I do still think they are going about this the wrong way, but they've pushed ZRS so much now, and spent so much time and money on it, that they feel they need to keep pushing on.
 
alex_cycles

alex_cycles

Veteran
Location
Oxfordshire
Whorty said:
Interesting - thanks for sharing.

I wonder if all those across the various social media platforms who tried to shut the likes of me up when I said their model was farcical will acknowledge that I was correct,
Click to expand...

I think you know the answer to that. :laugh: It was clearly not right from day 1, but I thought they would be a lot quicker fixing it. I also thought it would self-correct a lot better than it has, which is why I wanted to give it a decent chance.


Whorty said:
I look forward to seeing the new seed numbers and ZRS scores to see if they have it better, but I'm remain sceptical until then.
Click to expand...
That is justified.


Whorty said:
I do still think they are going about this the wrong way, but they've pushed ZRS so much now, and spent so much time and money on it, that they feel they need to keep pushing on.
Click to expand...
I still think it will get better with time. I just don't know if we'll all still be here when it's good :laugh:
 
Whorty

Whorty

Gets free watts from the Atom ;)
Location
Wiltshire
alex_cycles said:
I think you know the answer to that. :laugh: It was clearly not right from day 1, but I thought they would be a lot quicker fixing it. I also thought it would self-correct a lot better than it has, which is why I wanted to give it a decent chance.



That is justified.



I still think it will get better with time. I just don't know if we'll all still be here when it's good :laugh:
Click to expand...

Unfortunately I have the benefit of a statistical degree and a maths background, so I could probably (pun intended) see how the model was constructed better than most. That's where some of my frustration was coming from, that and being place in the above 350 group when I was still a D cat racer :laugh:
I still think they will end up going back to something like the CE system, although they'll call it something else to save face.
I do hope it gets better though as it's distracting at the moment and has spoiled racing for a large number of people.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
CXRAndy

CXRAndy

Guru
Location
Lincs
Carl you were right :biggrin:

My own experience was, I went from top 30% C to bottom 30% C. This was because riders who could now hold between 3.5-3.9W/kg for a 30 min event were in my grouping. Had I been 10-20 points less, I would have been in similar W/kg rider results to myself and everything would've been dandy.

Lets hope they get it right 🙏
 
OP
OP
CXRAndy

CXRAndy

Guru
Location
Lincs
13 rider said:
But looks at the maths ,he weighs twice what Andy Feather does but didn't take twice as long (apart from the lying down bit ) 😂 . Just think how quick he went down it
Click to expand...

His Watts per kg 2.79 for the climb if you ignore all the rest periods. :biggrin:

He needs a hell of a lot of cardio training to get up a climb like Alp D Huez He needs to gear down massively, and should not stand up under any circumstances whilst climbing ^_^
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Strathisla
Bkool and android box
Replies
0
markemark
Bkool for sale
Replies
0
S
MyWhoosh vs Zwift
Replies
18
thunderlips76
Gears slipping on zwift hub
Replies
11
Top Bottom