You'd still beat me anyway as you're a better rider
Here's exactly what I did. Single person event, so no draft influence.
My weight and height parameters 67kg 166cm rider. 200Watts constant except on the three climbing segments Sgurr North, Sgurr South, Sgurr North. For those I had 260 Watts constant.
It's a bit closer to how I would ride that route IRL than a constant Wattage. Here are the full results...
To start Sgurr N segment: 2:12 Tron, 2:20 Crux
To top Sgurr N segment: 6:19 Tron, 6:23 Crux
To Sgurr S start: 8:14 Tron, 8:26 Crux
To top Sgurr S: 10:30 Tron, 10:53 Crux
To Sgurr N2 start: 12:51 Tron, 13:16 Crux
To Sgurr N2 finish: 17:00 Tron, 17:20 Crux
All credit to Zwift Insider for doing such a fantastic amount of testing. But he can't find the time to sit and watch the progress and change the Wattage precisely at the segment starts like I did. For a race I care about, I will go the extra mile to get precisely tailored data and sometimes it pays off.
So that's weird and confusing isn't it that the CRR is less for the gravel bike than the road bike on gravel, and ZI's tests reflect that, but your tests show the opposite. Your change of watts is irrelevant, you shouldn't - in theory - be faster on a road bike than a gravel bike on that gravel surface but you find you are