Worst book you've ever read?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
I quite enjoyed LOTR, although it *does* take a fair while to really get going i.e. the whole "leaving the vale" thing with Tom Bombadil.

Another really awful set of books are the Thomas Covenant ones. Just dire.

I have said this before - but I read the Thomas Covenant ones several times

Eventually I realised that every time I read then I became really miserable - possible depressed - while I was reading them and then for a week of so after
AT the time I was half way through the last one and feeling really bad
I spent the rest of the day just reading it so I could finish it fully - then took the dog out for a very long walk and chucked the books in the bin

That is the only book I have ever read that had a direct and long lasting effect on my mood
 

Dogtrousers

Kilometre nibbler
I believe it was titled 'My Time' by Bradley Wiggins.
No structure to it, it just seemed like a hotchpotch of memories and recollections.

I think that's one I've got somewhere. My expectations of sports biogs are always rock bottom low and they are rarely even that good.
 

Dogtrousers

Kilometre nibbler
I believe it was titled 'My Time' by Bradley Wiggins.
No structure to it, it just seemed like a hotchpotch of memories and recollections.

I think that's one I've got somewhere. My expectations of sports biogs are always rock bottom low and they are rarely even that good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gbb

lazybloke

Priest of the cult of Chris Rea
Location
Leafy Surrey
I was a bit rude about LotR but it wasn't so bad.

"Dune", now that's a tedious read. The Gom Jabbar bit was interesting, but the rest of it utterly failed to engage me
 

Gillstay

Veteran
Pretty much any fiction book I have tried to read which turned out to have been on one of those intellectual 'book of the year' lists (such as the Whitbread prize or whatever its latest sponsors name is). I am not anti intellectual, its just most of those with intellectual aspirations who write fiction.... can't write fiction. The judges seem to view such manuscripts as Art, rather than asking if they are even halfway successful story telling. I now avoid prizewinning fiction on principle.

I also approach with caution books on lists such as the New York Times bestsellers list (and similar in other papers/publications) since I have seen alleged, it is easy for publishers to 'aquire' a place on the list by various means, the list inclusion by artifice pushing up sales by implying to potential purchasers the book is already very popular and of reasonable writing quality.

I take good physical care of books and often view them as 'for life'. I rememberr the last book I started to read that was awful, was so bad I stopped reading it and chucked in the rubbish bin to make sure no one else wasted any of thier life on it. I can't remember the title, but its the only book I have ever chosen to destroy.

We once left one in an obscure book store in Slovenia just to make sure it never came back to the UK :laugh:
 

Gwylan

Veteran
Location
All at sea⛵
When I was a young chap I met a Scottish woman who recommended Grey Granite by Lewis Grassic Gibbon. In order to impress her I duly read it. I was not impressed and neither was she.

Bridges of Madison County, I had an illicit, mid life crush. This book she recommended cured that.
 

All uphill

Still rolling along
Location
Somerset
I've tried to read Dickens several times and never really got along with him. I respect his contribution to literature but he's rather long-winded.

I've tried to read some James Joyce too and was utterly bamboozled. It's English Jim, but not as we know it.

Ulysses - the only book I know of which needs another book to try to explain it.

I can see and feel it's a work of genius, but I've never made it beyond 1/3 way through, so far.
 
My wife has spoiled a lot of books for me

She did History as a degree with a bit of English Literature thrown in somehow so she knows books!

Anyway - we were talking about book in general and I found a David Eddings book lying around that had managed to escape being lost when my life exploded a few times

anyway - she started reading it and pointed out how badly it was written compared to some authors that she would read

things like conversation being
He said xxx
SHe said yyy
He exclaimed zzz

and so on

and some other stuff that she had found in just the first few pages

Mean that I have trouble reading some sci-fi and fantasy authors that I used to like!

but it does make me realise that I read some books VERY fast
and other books quite slowly
and the difference is how well they are written - the well written ones make me concentrate on the actual details and the words and every sentence has meaning and every paragraph has depth

The books I read fast are not as well written so I automatically skip a lot of the words and concentrate on the words and emotions

which is what makes the original David Eddings books good - teh characters are good and the interactiosn are good
but a lot of the in between stuff is not all that good
Lord of the RIngs is the opposite and I read every word - sometimes 2 or 3 times to tyr a different rhythm which extracts a different meaning - especially with the Elvish and other rhymes and songs




I do however read a lot fo WW2 history boosk written by people who were there (or their parents were) and they have gathered together the experiences of people from the same squadron etc and tried to put them together in a sensible manner
but they are not writers and it shows
but the emotions and desire to record the experiences are enough to make the whole book interesting
examples have included squadrons attacking Italien and German shipping the in Mediterranean and similar arourn the UK - both were very different
and also the experiences of men in the MTB and MGS boats operating teh channel

not good writing from a technical point of view - but the raw writing is compelling

anyway not exactly on the thread topic - sorry
 
Top Bottom