jonny jeez
Legendary Member
- Location
- Chislehurst, Kent, UK
NASA now suggests a manned trip to mars in 2030...or there abouts, yet the technology and resources are available to send man to the red planet within the next 10 years. In fact it seems we could go within the next 3 but would need to delay untill the budgets catch up with us over the following 7 years.
NASA states concerns, like back contamination, planetary protection and radiation ...and then sets out to spend billions of bucks and years of time researching every last detail.
A single objective mission (like going to the moon in the 60s) stands the risk of putting all of NASAs financial eggs in a one basket and ultimately could lead to cancellation of funding. Without a few side projects on the go, this would leave NASA in a financially vulnerable position.
Is NASA scared of loosing astronauts, or scared of loosing funding?
NASA states concerns, like back contamination, planetary protection and radiation ...and then sets out to spend billions of bucks and years of time researching every last detail.
A single objective mission (like going to the moon in the 60s) stands the risk of putting all of NASAs financial eggs in a one basket and ultimately could lead to cancellation of funding. Without a few side projects on the go, this would leave NASA in a financially vulnerable position.
Is NASA scared of loosing astronauts, or scared of loosing funding?