Yellow Saddle
Guru
- Location
- Loch side.
OK, it was a bit naughty. I should have been frank and stated the truth by saying: "This is getting worse and worse."
OK, it was a bit naughty. I should have been frank and stated the truth by saying: "This is getting worse and worse."
No and no.Hey i’ve just bought the trek roscoe 6 19, and i’ve had it for a day been on it maybe 4/5 hours and i do admit i do wheelies and i like swerve stuff and i’ve noticed the wheel is a little buckled not a lot but a little and i don’t know if i’m being para but does wheelie damage the back wheel to a point of not being able to ride it and is it possible to do it so soon?? please i need answers
Cheers mateNo and no.
No and no.
Does that mean that the buckle was there to begin with? Otherwise what would have caused the buckle (if it was not doing wheelies)?
I was looking at some wheels in the bike shop yesterday and noticed that the more expensive high-end wheels have much higher spoke tension. What is the reason for this? I've noticed the spokes on my bike (BTwin Triban 3) are tight but not as tight as this.
Would there be any benefit in tightening my spokes? Say, 1/4-1/2 turn all round the wheel and then re-true?
How did 'looking at the wheels' allow you to 'notice' that the spoke tension was higher, please? I'll go for a 'no'.I was looking at some wheels in the bike shop yesterday and noticed that the more expensive high-end wheels have much higher spoke tension. What is the reason for this? I've noticed the spokes on my bike (BTwin Triban 3) are tight but not as tight as this.
Would there be any benefit in tightening my spokes? Say, 1/4-1/2 turn all round the wheel and then re-true?
Why does the total tension (presumably you mean adding the tension of all the spokes together) need to be the same? This implies that a 16 spoke wheel wIll have twice the spoke tension of a 32 spoke wheel. I pity the rim of that 16 spoke wheel. If this question is too simple, please share the complexities with us.If you think about the wheel as a system and the total tension of all the spokes required to keep a wheel circular and true then divide by the number of spokes and you will immediately see the need for greater tension. This is a bit of a simplification . . .
It doesn't need to be be the same in the way you are implying but for a given rider weight there needs to be enough strength in the system to counteract the load (Force) on the wheels. Reducing the number of spokes increases the amount of load that each spoke will account for - this is complicated by the fact that not all spokes are evenly loaded as the wheel goes around.How did 'looking at the wheels' allow you to 'notice' that the spoke tension was higher, please? I'll go for a 'no'.
Why does the total tension (presumably you mean adding the tension of all the spokes together) need to be the same? This implies that a 16 spoke wheel wIll have twice the spoke tension of a 32 spoke wheel. I pity the rim of that 16 spoke wheel. If this question is too simple, please share the complexities with us.
Cheap factory wheels tend to come with under tension straight spokes. Higher end wheels tend to come with better spokes, more spokes tension and fewer spokes too.I was looking at some wheels in the bike shop yesterday and noticed that the more expensive high-end wheels have much higher spoke tension. What is the reason for this? I've noticed the spokes on my bike (BTwin Triban 3) are tight but not as tight as this.
Would there be any benefit in tightening my spokes? Say, 1/4-1/2 turn all round the wheel and then re-true?
Does that mean that the buckle was there to begin with? Otherwise what would have caused the buckle (if it was not doing wheelies)?
1. Agreed but. Assuming a 100kg load (rider and bike) and an even split rear/front (it's not) that means the load on the wheel is 490N (50kg x g).for a given rider weight there needs to be enough strength in the system to counteract the load (Force) on the wheels. [1] Reducing the number of spokes increases the amount of load that each spoke will account for [2] - this is complicated by the fact that not all spokes are evenly loaded as the wheel goes around.[3]
This Wjeelfanatyk article seemed relevant to me, to help inform the answer to @overmind 's question.So as this (model front) wheel rolls, the spoke tension cycles between (slightly over) 1000N (when horizontal) through 880N down to 740N and back up. The more spokes in a wheel the less reduction (%) the lowest spoke experiences. Will the magnitude of the cyclical range of tensile force in a spoke be related to fatique life? Probably (intuitively), but I don't know.
I think your understanding is correct except for the concept of "total tension doubled". The total tension in a 16-spoke wheel is not as high as that of a 32-spoke wheel, It simply cannot be because spokes are already loaded at the upper end of their tensile strength and, that would put an enormous amount of tension on sparsely-spaced spots on the rim. In short, it is just about impossible to double the tension of some spokes in a wheel. Typically, I'd build a 32-spoke wheel with about 1500N on the right hand spokes. To double it would imply 3000N. At that tension the nipples will not turn, the spoke will rotate with the nipple, the rim will burst and your fingers will fall off.It doesn't need to be be the same in the way you are implying but for a given rider weight there needs to be enough strength in the system to counteract the load (Force) on the wheels. Reducing the number of spokes increases the amount of load that each spoke will account for - this is complicated by the fact that not all spokes are evenly loaded as the wheel goes around.
I do have a rudimentary understanding of how this works, but I'm not an engineer and I know what I don't know, so at this point I'm going to bail and page @Yellow Saddle who will no doubt point out where I've gone wrong above anyway