This is a strange metric to consider.
Why? Shows the relative value people put on cars vs homes.
FWIW the Tuesday household is in the very privileged position of owning one house and two cars outright. The house, bought ~25 years ago is worth something well north of £500k now. The cars are both over 10 years old, a Skoda Citigo and a Galaxy. I would guess their combined value is below £2k, as they're both tatty and feature moss growing in various places. Having worthless cars is great, removes all stress and most cost from ownership.
So for the quiz, we're below 1-5% but not quite at zero.
The Galaxy is only really kept as long distance bike transport, and the value of bikes on top definitely exceeds the value of the car, making us rule 25 compliant.
But relative value calculations are just a product of the value of items you are comparing.
Intrinsic value is, of course, different and probably a more interesting question.
Our car is worth around 3.5% of our house value. That does not reflect, in any way, the value we put on the vehicle vs our home value.
3.5% is simply a product of the price of the car vs our house value.
This is a strange metric to consider.
As our car has depreciated in value and house prices have risen, the car is worth at least an order of magnitude less relative to the house than it was when we bought it. We can't afford to do anything about either so 🤷♂️
That’s why my late Fathers advice was so sensible, buy a house you can’t afford and buy a car you can afford to throw away.
I didn’t take any notice, here is my 911 outside our two bed terrace 20 years ago!
View attachment 747117
Have you still got the car?