Any more details on the test protocols those numbers come from, to give context to the numbers?
In a nutshell: Every 'block' is 1000km. First one is dry and no contamination - pretty self-explanatory (real-life situation would be indoor cycling). Second is dry and some contamination (real-life situation would be dry and dusty road/CX/gravel). Third is a repeat of the first after a full clean. Fourth is wet and some contamination (real-life situation would be wet road/CX/gravel). Fifth is another clean and no contamination (repeat of first and third). Last one is extreme contamination (real-life situation would be muddy MTB/CX).
Based on what sort of riding you want to do, you can look at specific testing conditions and make an informed decision. The biggest downside is that the lube that you're looking at is not on there - because of how long it takes them to get through the test protocol.
I personally find the 'cost to run' table most interesting. It's a per 10000km estimated total cost of using each lubricant - including cost of the solution itself, as well as worn components (calculated on Ultegra-level stuff), based on mixed riding from blocks 1-5 (so without extreme contamination).