Andrew_Culture
Internet Marketing bod
- Location
- The People's Republic Of Suffolk.
Thanks again you lot, above all I'm really enjoying this whole process
Carry on cycling then !
your GUY hangs out? Are you referring to Andrew jnr? You can get locked up for behaviour like thatYup, I'm feeling much better for eating properly, and if people would stop buying me beer I'm sure a bit more belly will drop off! My guy only really hangs out when I slouch now, which is major progress.
In the same period I cycled 91.62 miles burning a theoretical 6214kcal
I agree that there is probably a bit of an overestimation, maybe not a huge one. I work on the basis that if I cycle at 90% effort (depending on which bike, that's averaging between 18-22mph) over 10miles or approx 30 minutes then I'm going to burn around 500 calories.I think you're hugely overestimating the calories that you're burning, but if you're losing weight anyway then it probably doesn't matter that much.
I agree that there is probably a bit of an overestimation, maybe not a huge one. I work on the basis that if I cycle at 90% effort (depending on which bike, that's averaging between 18-22mph) over 10miles or approx 30 minutes then I'm going to burn around 500 calories.
For 90 miles I'll therefore expect to burn 4500 calories not 6000+
I may be being a little conservative, but it's better to be that way if weight loss is the goal - to ensure you're not over-replenishing.
It very much depends how much effort you're exerting and what your heart rate is. For weight loss and fat burn a steadier speed at a lower heart rate is generally accepted as being more productive.
That's calories according to Endomondo, although to follow up one of the points above I never dawdle
If I could afford to I'd get a heartrate monitor to make things a bit more accurate
A HR monitor would make the calorie guess different, not necessarily closer to reality.