Ludicrous? Really? Some of the gradients have been up to 20%Some of the riders are using 36x32. Ludricrous on a professional racing bike.
This is all about allowing the unfit and often overweight sportive riding masses to 'look the part', to allow them to ride bikes that look pretty much identical to the ones used by the pro's. Routing a Grand Tour over such steep climbs forces the pro teams to fit the same granny gears as the sportive riders. But it comes at the cost of ever more treacherous descents.
Don't descend into a defensive debate of the decent descents...I don't know where to start
This is all about allowing the unfit and often overweight sportive riding masses to 'look the part', to allow them to ride bikes that look pretty much identical to the ones used by the pro's. Routing a Grand Tour over such steep climbs forces the pro teams to fit the same granny gears as the sportive riders. But it comes at the cost of ever more treacherous descents.
Routing a Grand Tour over such steep climbs forces the pro teams to fit the same granny gears as the sportive riders.
But it comes at the cost of ever more treacherous descents.
Could you imagine the Giro without the steep stuff.
Looking at the profile, Mont du Chat would appear to be a piece of piss compared to the Mortirolo or Zoncolan.
"Le freewheel, sur un velo de racing? Zut alors, c'est ludicreux" They were saying. Probably.
So you consider it justified for your sporting entertainment that Grand Tour contenders be put in the position of life threatening danger in order to compete ? There has always been an element of this but not to the same extent as exists now. As TCP noted recently, in the 80's and 90's not much ever happened on the descents, the descents used to be the periods in the race to cut to the adverts.What made it dangerous was Richie Porte taking too many risks to keep up with more accomplished descenders, and Baldato more or less admitted as much.
Look out! Straw man alert........
And there it is, right on cue.you consider it justified for your sporting entertainment that Grand Tour contenders be put in the position of life threatening danger in order to compete ?
There has always been an element of this but not to the same extent as exists now. As TCP noted recently, in the 80's and 90's not much ever happened on the descents, the descents used to be the periods in the race to cut to the adverts.
So you consider it justified for your sporting entertainment that Grand Tour contenders be put in the position of life threatening danger in order to compete ?