Better now?
It's small salve on the pain of thinking Kwiatkowski might stay with Froome today
Better now?
Anyone else catch the Porte interview on ITV, came across as disrespectful/dismissive of Nairo Quintana to me?
CN Forums gone down. Has 'The Clinic' self destructed or disappeared up it's own collective armholes?Indeed.
That sky are doping but Lopez, EBH and Suitsou are not? There is plenty of talk about it on other forums but i just don't buy it. They have made too firm a point by removing ex dopers from their set up. I seriously hope nothing fishy is going on, it would be quite literally shite.I know I keep banging on about this but David Lopez, Siutsou and EBH are underperforming iy seems to me. EBH has contested some sprints but he was a lot stronger in support of Wiggins last year. Kimmage may have a point.
Those times don't seem correct. Here's a good article for anyone who speaks power. We need to know what Froome's actual time was but even at 23:14, it looks believable.probably caused by this..... Best times up Ax-3-Domaines
1. Laiseka 2001 22:57
2. Armstrong 22:59 2001
3. Froome 23:14 2013.
Yeh i am hearing 23:15 so the time seems right. He does have a rather impressive watts/kg though. He weighs somewhere in the region of 70kg's, more likely 68-69kg's during the Tour. For someone who is 6 foot+ that's pretty light. He must average 6 to 6.5watts/kg up these climbs, when he is at max. To be able to sustain that for 20-30+ minutes is the tricky part. He is clearly in peak fitness and todays result proves that. No reason to suspect anything else imo.Those times don't seem correct. Here's a good article for anyone who speaks power. We need to know what Froome's actual time was but even at 23:14, it looks believable.
http://www.sportsscientists.com/2013/07/ax-3-domaines-history-vams-and.html
I don't know what you mean, all my KOM's are into headwinds.Depends on the wind as well, as anyone who's ever set a PR over a strava segment should honestly tell you!