what's the difference here then. Is this expert punditry is it. It's hard to tell the difference sometimes.
Just another opinion from someone who thinks he knows best, like you correctly imply Crackle.
FWIW I've taken on-board a lot of what others have said about Cavendish and Froome and I'm not the same opinion as I was a few short weeks ago now. Perhaps also, I, we're talking about separate things? Maybe we're talking as spectators but at other times 'have-a-go Brailsford's'?
If, for example, Cav's goal is Olympic Gold then time will tell whether he will feel supported at the 2013 TDF. I'd suggest that if his ultimate goal as a cyclist, and perhaps it's not, is to win the most stages ever as a rider then I still think he'd be better off with a train/team dedicated to him, but as others have said that isn't his objective
this year and it certainly wasn't Team Sky's. However, perhaps as a spectator I subjectively wanted to see that even though my mind told me that earlier in the season, he did get good support in the Giro and with a combination of bad luck and other factors he didn't pull it off. No place like the Tour de France though eh, and the disappointment of his lonely role which I perceived to be that of a team sprinter/scavenger of stages as opposed a far more important figure in the rainbow jersey. I accept then that this was what Sky had in order for him but it does remain to be seen what will happen after Olympic Gold..?
Equally, as a spectator I'd have loved to have seen Chris Froome, standing as I was in Cycle City Pau on the big screen that day on Thursday July 12th's 11th stage in the Alps, take out Pierre Rolland because he gave such a fantastic ride and deserved it. He would have too if he hadn't have been held back and whilst team orders for the greater good is no new thing to cycling, I'm not so sure that Wiggins would have lost the kind of time that would have been precarious but who knows? As others have suggested, I'm not Dave Brailsford. Either way it would have been great to see given that one of Froome's other great acts this tour was to protect Wiggins all the way up La Planche Des Belles Filles and still have the power left to finish the job. Remarkable.
Roll on 2013 and well done Gentleman Wiggins and all of Team Sky who have, undoubtedly, worked tremendously well and dominated from start to finish.
Again, as a spectator, the prospect of the two best riders in the tour riding against each other sounds great but perhaps others would prefer to see Team Sky, remain as they were this year? Time will tell and I think I know what I'd prefer, aside my liking for old sideburns. I'd imagine some of us might argue, given the dominance of the riders of the 'Death Star', that it may even be for the good of cycling?