cyberknight
As long as I breathe, I attack.
- Location
- Land of confusion
PTFE is for frying pans, not cables. It is too soft to resist the fretting motion of a gear or brake cable and quickly crumbles off, jamming (or alt least hindering) the inner's free movement through the outer. This doesn't mean that PTFE coated cables have less friction than naked steel cables, it just means that the effect doesn't last and when it fails, it goes pear-shaped.Just my observations:
On my most recent cable installation I used PTFE coated cable, and aside from some adjustments needed after the first 60km of riding the shifting has been entirely reliable over the last two years. A similar installation using plain jagwire cable needed adjustment three times over the same two year period, but I only replaced the inner cables. I find it hard to draw any meaningful conclusions from this, although I may purchase the PTFE coated cable kit next time I overhaul the gear cables.
The reason for this is cable housing wear
Whilst you are right on your basic metallurgy I think you may have misunderstood the forces acting on helically-wound cable. I don't expect any of the individual strands to stretch but real world experience suggests that minor adjustments to the indexing are often necessary after a few tens or hundreds of miles .... and thereafter things don't change much for a few thousand. I can't see this being explained by the nylon inner starting to wear and then suddenly becoming hard enough to resist the wear.Pre-stretch is also a myth. This gives the impression that steel is soft until it has been stretched. Steel strains perfectly linearly in range before yield. To turn the phrase around (as I've heard before) and say that a "pre-stretch" isn't really a stretch but just a settling in of the winds in the cable is also wrong. For wires wound helically around each other to settle in a different position after a bit of tension would imply that they have yielded (taken on a permanent set), and this is not possible, as I've explained earlier.
Whilst you are right on your basic metallurgy I think you may have misunderstood the forces acting on helically-wound cable. I don't expect any of the individual strands to stretch but real world experience suggests that minor adjustments to the indexing are often necessary after a few tens or hundreds of miles .... and thereafter things don't change much for a few thousand. I can't see this being explained by the nylon inner starting to wear and then suddenly becoming hard enough to resist the wear.
I agree about the PTFE coated inners though - waste of time.
Also not, all shifters I know of has a metal (usually zinc die-case) cable end receiver. However, even plastics won't yield on gear mechanisms.
I'm kinda delaying the answer because I'm waiting for the peanut gallery to retort. But I'll let the cat out of the bag.
Gear mechanism do go out of tune over time. The reason for this is cable housing wear. Wherever the housing makes a turn, the moving inner cable tends to file and fret away at the soft nylon inner lining and take a shortcut through the corner. It's the exact opposite of a river that erodes the outer radius on the bends. When this happens to a cable, the inner cable becomes relatively longer to the outer cable and the settings go out. However, the cable never stretched.
On brake cables there is sufficient force involved for the inner cable to show signs of wear at those sharp turns. This is visible upon inspection as shiny bits. If you rearrange the little bits of housing on a table, the shiny bits corresponds with the sharp bends, especially the one where the rear brake cable makes a transition from top tube to seat stay.
@mickle
What are your thoughts on cable stretch ?
Just my observation... my bikes that have Shimano SP41 cable (ptfe) always seem to shift more consistently and for longer than those without.
Im not gonna argue about it, that's just how it seems to me, so much so that I brought a 10 metre coil of sp41.
And maybe i value your opinion , bike related of courseSh!t stirrer!
And maybe i value your opinion , bike related of course
Agreed, 'Pounds off = £££'The difference comes in with the finish - DA for instance is incredibly beautifully finished - as well as durability and of course, weight. I doubt there is a lower end product that is more durable than its most expensive counterpart though.
.
If you compare to derailleurs - one say a Dura Ace and the other a Tiagra, you'll notice that the Dura ace one has almost no steel anywhere. Even the bolts are titanium. The cages are carbon or aluminium.
The difference in weight is quite phenomenal as well. It isn't all that obvious when you handle only the high-end product but if you handle both, the difference is startling.
.
Could it be the softer metal of the nipple distorting?Not quite. Bedding in at both ends suggests some sort of yield in the steel, which I've explained is not possible, particularly on gear mechanisms where the tension is very, very low.
Could it be the softer metal of the nipple distorting?