How do food advertisers, suppliers and packagers get away with their food images? Take macdonalds for example, they have images of quarter pounders with plenty of crispy lettuce, pickles, ketchup, etc. Then you buy it and get a thin meat pattie, a single piece of limp lettuce, at most one pickle slice and ketchup so thin you're not even sure it's there!
Pizza boxes with images of handmade pizzas restaurants would be proud of containing pizzas that have very little toppings that looks like it's artificial sauce on it.
Food advertisements are supposedly controlled by false advertising legislation I thought but not with images used to sell it.
I think that any supplier or advertiser of Food should be subhected to the simple test. Does it turn out like the advert or packaging images of the average purchaser follows the cooking instructions? Does the food you get given match the images in the takeaway? If not then the supplying and advertising company should be heavily fined and made to use the images taken as evidence for their advertising. Can you imagine an image of a quarter pounder that looks more like a tenth of a pounder without anything added like lettuce, pickles or ketchup being used to sell the product? I'd love for certain major fast food chains selling their products with realistic images of what they're selling.