That a 0-6-0T not a 0-6-047279 on static display at Oxenhope?
That a 0-6-0T not a 0-6-047279 on static display at Oxenhope?
Dug out the relevant Locomotives Illustrated this morning - 863 built by the LNWR to its own orders commencing in 1857 but one (no.550) was sold in 1861 to the Portpatrick Railway and then exchanged for No.638 in 1862. No.550 then passed via Beyer Peacock to the Swedish State Railway. Six completed in 1871 (Nos 2039-2044) were sold after two months to the L&Y for whom a further 80 were built. Construction of the last examples for the LNWR took place in 1872 while those for the L&Y were built through to 1874. Consequently the number in use on the LNWR was a maximum, the magazine says, of 857 but I make it 855.Yes, LNWR DX Goods. Some of them made it to LMS days. Utterly forgotten now, along with John Ramsbottom, who also invented the metal piston ring, water trough and the first safety valve that couldn't be tampered with.
This afternoon, during a potter around
There can't be many on this thread, who don't know this name?
View attachment 526233
View attachment 526235
https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/955146
View attachment 526234
Yesterday ride took me past the former station at Masham, inconveniently situated around a mile east of the town on the wrong side of the River Ure so it was an relatively early casualty in losing passenger services on New Years Day 1931 apart from occasional excursion trains. Goods services were withdrawn in November 1963. From 1906 a siding extended from the goods yard across the road, the metal gates on the left side of the road look suspicious in this respect, to a yard from where a narrow gauge railway ran westwards in connection with the building of Roundhill Reservoir by Harrogate Corporation and subsequently Leighton Reservoir by Leeds Corporation. The narrow gauge line was lifted in 1932/33 and of light construction with timber trestle viaducts including across the River Ure little trace of it exists today .
View attachment 525271
That's earlier than I thought. Some guards, whilst it was Arriva "operated" were saying they'd be running them next year as well.Great news for fans of Pacers...but possibly not such great news for other rail users
https://www.railadvent.co.uk/2020/0...r-trains-are-coming-back-to-the-mainline.html
That's earlier than I thought. Some guards, whilst it was Arriva "operated" were saying they'd be running them next year as well.
They've been allowed to keep the 153's running, on certain routes.
They've only just refitted the 142's though.As things stand I suppose the extra space is handy for social distancing as I doubt they'll be running them full at the moment.
I am surprised they've kept the 142s rather than the marginally more modern 143/144 units, presumably due to cost / lease co arrangements.
That last bit is not quite right. The Earls names were transferred to the modern, powerful Castle class locomotives because they were unhappy with them being attached to the ostensibly new but very old fashioned looking "Dukedog" class:Ah, it's not like in "real" GWR days when they cast a big brass nameplate and the engine kept it for life (or until politics* or complaints from the named person** forced a change).
*LNER A4 Union Of South Africa was Osprey for a while during apartheid, the original Osprey having been renamed after an LNER bigwig
**some of the Earls didn't like their titles being applied to the Castle class. A smoky steam engine ferrying the proles to the seaside? How ghastly.