The new improved Lance Armstrong discussion thread.*

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
I love the concept of SKY being in any way a clean or respectable sponsor

The Murdoch Empire is as corrupt, sleazy and contemptible as any organisation you would care to name.

Or are their activities acceptable now?
 

dellzeqq

pre-talced and mighty
Location
SW2
With the no-contest, Lance isn't admitting defeat but using the same tactic employed by the Tea Party. Don't engage with the opposition. Don't argue on the issues. Instead, create an alternative reality through compliant media outlets. Gather as many supporters as possible into the bubble and discredit and vilify anything that comes from outside. Try to blow the bubble out as big as possible.
yes indeed. If you can work your way past the advertising take a look (or rather listen) to the video
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/vid...armstrong-speaks-livestrong-anniversary-video
'it's been a difficult couple of weeks, for me, for my family, for my friends, for this foundation'.. 'I've been better, but I've also been worse'.... 'humbling'. After the Nixonian non-denial denial we now have the non-apology apology
 
I love the concept of SKY being in any way a clean or respectable sponsor

The Murdoch Empire is as corrupt, sleazy and contemptible as any organisation you would care to name.

Or are their activities acceptable now?

No, they're just much better at hacking the phones of the testers so they know when they can glow. ;)
 

Scoosh

Velocouchiste
Moderator
Location
Edinburgh
There is a big difference between a professional cycling racing team and how it is run ...


... and a sponsoring company and how it is run.

Isn't there ?
 

MichaelM

Guru
Location
Tayside
Google is your friend!

Spend a few minutes on Google investigating SKY and News Corp, and all will be revealed

I'm aware of the antics of the Maxwells, but I don't think your word choice was accidental:

I love the concept of SKY being in any way a clean or respectable sponsor...

with obvious connotations to doping.

Now I wouldn't bet my house on all the riders in team SKY being clean, but I very much doubt there's an organized regime. Why you try to muddy the waters this way I don't know.
 

BJH

Über Member
I'm aware of the antics of the Maxwells, but I don't think your word choice was accidental:



with obvious connotations to doping.

Now I wouldn't bet my house on all the riders in team SKY being clean, but I very much doubt there's an organized regime. Why you try to muddy the waters this way I don't know.


Think you mean Murdoch Not Maxwell

I mentioned them first, it was as part of a comment on Rabobank opting to leave, nothing to do with the team or suggesting anything going on.

Merely linking the disgraceful antics of the Murdoch owned press to the equally disgraced antics if the UCI.

It's relevant given Rabobanks comments on not wanting to be associated with the actions of the sports governing body, which every other sponsor must also be questioning at the moment - unless of course disgraceful behaviours is the norm for them too.
 
Top Bottom