Acceptance Insurance is a new name to me. I want to read more of it. Were they an SCA underwriter or was this a completely separate policy? If the latter, Tygart's words of 'organised conspiracy' ring even truer perhaps. The whole saga begins to look more about financial scam/sting as it does about doping to win the TdF.
The FRS lawsuit actually makes me smile. False claims in advertising?! Whatever next! That does smack of bandwagon stuff! I can't see it succeeding since because, to be serious for a moment, if one looks at it legally the complainant would have to prove the claims made by the sports drink manufacturer were false.
That Armstrong doped is fact - that he won the TdF because of the dope and NOT the sports drink might be somewhat harder to prove!
.... and the other clever aspect about Armstrong's "it was obvious that USPS was doping" defence is that this at least in part will require the companies to prove that they were neither complicit, uaware, or even suspicious of the doping activities. If evaen a easonable doubt can be placed that they were aware of the team's activities (due diligence?) then the case falls apart