The new improved Lance Armstrong discussion thread.*

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Just finished watching the interview, I won't spoil it for those who haven't yet seen it, suffice to say it is about what many of us expected, disappointing and contrived despite admitting taking peds.
 

Zofo

Veteran
Location
Leicester
Just watched the whole thing and, as expected, LA was in charge and only really saying what he wanted to say and in a way that suited him. He refuses to be drawn into issues with named individuals by saying he wont go there etc. It went about as well for him as it could possibly have done, considering he's admitting to being a total fraud, cheat, bully and total peanut.
 

2pies

Veteran
Location
Brighton
I'm not defending Lance, I wasn't even a huge fan of him at the time, but the real truth is this:

Twenty of the twenty-one podium finishers in the Tour de France from 1999 through 2005 have been directly tied to likely doping through admissions, sanctions, public investigations or exceeding the UCI hematocrit threshold.

Reports also say that Lance was the king-pin of it all, as far as US Postal was concerned, but did no other high-profile riders assume similar roles within their teams e.g. Pantani, Ullrich, Beloki, Vinokourov?

Also, other TdF winners have admitted to doping, yet they haven't had their names struck from the records. Why?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GBC

T.M.H.N.E.T

Rainbows aren't just for world champions
Location
Northern Ireland
His fanboys will do one of two things

  1. Defend him as a "hero" who has done a lot for cancer ( but not for research ie: he hasn't saved one life)
  2. Say nothing
 

Noodley

Guest
I'm not defending Lance, I wasn't even a huge fan of him at the time, but the real truth is this:

Twenty of the twenty-one podium finishers in the Tour de France from 1999 through 2005 have been directly tied to likely doping through admissions, sanctions, public investigations or exceeding the UCI hematocrit threshold.

Reports also say that Lance was the king-pin of it all, as far as US Postal was concerned, but did no other high-profile riders assume similar roles within their teams e.g. Pantani, Ullrich, Beloki, Vinokourov?

Also, other TdF winners have admitted to doping, yet they haven't had their names struck from the records. Why?

Oh it's been a while but why not:


View: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGI8YNa5f-M
 

mooseracer

Guru
Location
Nr Bristol
So it's now without even the tiniest amount of doubt that Lance was a drug cheat. Watching him in the tdf was an inspiration to me and is what got me into road biking and away from the mtb. I can't say I'm outraged particularly, it's the fact he held himself (and was held up) as the 'great hope' of clean cycling, putting the dirty past away for good etc that I suppose makes so many people's blood boil.

The brashness, aggressive nature, bullying etc doesn't really bother me either - exists in many top sportsmen.

I do find it genuinely amazing how people get sooo worked up about this - he's just another druggy from the past, don't worry they're all clean now. Oh, wait.......
 
Top Bottom