The new improved Lance Armstrong discussion thread.*

[rich p]

I have no problem understanding this

The claim that discussing other dopers is obfuscating and apologist was all your own work

Or are you now denying that you have ever stated this?

Yes
Now please either shut up or say something sensible.

 

[Noodley]

 

[ufkacbln]

Lets confirm that - you are unequivocally claiming that you have never,at any point stated that pointing out that other riders using drugs was obfuscation, apologist And unacceptable

 

[tigger]

So does this thread automatically destruct when we get to 100 pages?

 

[Hotblack Desiato]

So does this thread automatically destruct when we get to 100 pages?

Maybe it will when Lance Armstrong admits the truth? Or hell freezes over?

 

[rich p]

Lets confirm that - you are unequivocally claiming that you have never,at any point stated that pointing out that other riders using drugs was obfuscation, apologist And unacceptable

Are you talking to me?

How many times can I say that I, and indeed the others on here with any knowledge and historic interest in pro-cycling, have always deplored and highlighted drug abuse in cycling. You, on the other hand, have not appeared in this section until you decided to fight Armstrong's case even when he and his lawyers had given up.

 

[Noodley]

Nothing seems to have changed according to an Italian judge:

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/italian-judge-says-doping-is-still-a-problem-in-cycling

 

[rich p]

On reflection having another argument with a know-nothing is both distracting and pointless.

And so to save everyone's blood pressure and ennui I will put the (insert epithet of your choice) back on ignore and give up my Xmas spirit of inclusiveness as a failed attempt.

 

[ufkacbln]

Are you talking to me?

How many times can I say that I, and indeed the others on here with any knowledge and historic interest in pro-cycling, have always deplored and highlighted drug abuse in cycling. You, on the other hand, have not appeared in this section until you decided to fight Armstrong's case even when he and his lawyers had given up.

Simply a lie, and your failure to read what was actually written.....


Please give any example where I have "fought his case"

Unless of course we are back to the anyone in sufficiently rabid is an apologist again?

Your answer to any post that is outside your closed agenda

 

[tigger]

I think some people should get a room!

 

[johnr]

Maybe it will when Lance Armstrong admits the truth? Or hell freezes over?

Well, that day has come. Pharmstrong's deadline for appeal passed on 27 December, so whilst the words haven't left his lips, he's just lit the gas under his goose and it is now officially cooked.

 

[Noodley]

Awww poor Uncle Pat says that nasty man Kimmage is picking on him
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/mcquaid-all-ive-done-since-i-became-president-is-fight-doping

It's almost like reading something Lance woulda said.

 

[MichaelM]

100 pages again!

Let's close it and start another, could call it...
The new even more improved Lance Armstrong discussion thread - it's better than ever before!


See if that gets to 100 pages as well!

 

[Zofo]

Whose for an official LA book burning day?

 

[ufkacbln]

Whose for an official LA book burning day?

"Where they have burned books, they will end in burning human beings.”
― Heinrich Heine