I disagree. 4x4s are far more capable of this, both objectively because of their design and in my own, subjective experience.
Again the evidence suggests that you're far more likely to suffer from a collision with a 4x4. I've posted links to this before.
And overall, they are not.
Replying to the points made. Same size, weight and bhp. Not sure how you can argue that.
Still interested to know if you feel as intimidated by something like a Tesla Y as you do a Range Rover and why?
The point about injury is in reply to your being passed at speed. At speed, they're all going to kill you but maybe with a little variance in outcome if you're lucky. At lower speed your point stands but that doesn't mean they need banning. Personally, a Fiesta and lorry give me exactly the same feeling when getting close so maybe I don't understand your increased intimidation aspect that well.
Any car can ignore traffic calming or bump up a curb. By design a 4x4 may not feel it as much but any car can go over them at any speed. It's the idiot behind the wheel that makes that decision. If someone asked me how I would describe a Range Rover driver I'd say they are fairly safe. The majority I see are being driven at the right speed and not taking risks. Maybe courtesy lacks a little but that's a personal observation.
Pollution, you may have a point and we should be heading towards greater economy but as I've said time over, you could compare something like a family sports hatch and it will have an equal or worst MPG than the supposed "gas guzzler" (Defender up thread) that everyone is frothing about. But that's OK because it's not as easily identifiable.
There is no easy answer but the discussion needs to go on. Maybe on the other thread though? -------->