The CycleChat Helmet Debate Thread

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

keithmac

Guru
They're just annoyed they didn't hound me out of the thread by the looks of it.

Onward and upward..
 

srw

It's a bit more complicated than that...
So you weren't offended by his so called 'far from respectful post' yet randomly dug it up.
No - just pointing out (as I said, quite clearly), that I didn't think he was being particularly respectful. An impression supported by the very next post after yours...

They're just annoyed they didn't hound me out of the thread by the looks of it.

Onward and upward..

"They"?
"Onward and upward"?

That's hardly the language of someone who is engaging with respect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mjr

doog

....
That's hardly the language of someone who is engaging with respect.

What exactly is 'engaging with respect' ?

Is is because his views dont compute with yours on helmet wearing ? . Who's respect does he need to earn to post on here ? Is it a closed shop ?

You've already castigated me for allegedly not partaking in the whole thread - yet totally unaware of why I and others have been unable to .
 

srw

It's a bit more complicated than that...
What exactly is 'engaging with respect' ?

Is is because his views dont compute with yours on helmet wearing ? . Who's respect does he need to earn to post on here ? Is it a closed shop ?

You've already castigated me for allegedly not partaking in the whole thread - yet totally unaware of why I and others have been unable to .
You tell me, since you originally brought it up.....
and yet its a sad state of affairs that you have been told on two occasions to stop posting on the thread for simply airing your views in a quite respectful way.

All I'm saying is that your and my view of "respect" are at odds. In my book it involves actually acknowledging what someone else has spent 279 pages saying, rather than wading in with the same old thing yet again.
 

doog

....
Er, no, you made the claim, so show us the actual posts so that we can understand exactly what was said.

No you read it wibble ....Ive just been accused by srw of not partaking in 270 pages...Im sure its within you capabilities
 

srw

It's a bit more complicated than that...
No you read it wibble ....Ive just been accused by swl of not partaking in 270 pages...Im sure its within you capabilities
I say!

That's a bit of a case of mistaken identity.
 

srw

It's a bit more complicated than that...
No you read it wibble ....Ive just been accused by srw of not partaking in 270 pages...Im sure its within you capabilities
Oh, and once again the "accusation" is entirely in your own mind.
 

keithmac

Guru
No - just pointing out (as I said, quite clearly), that I didn't think he was being particularly respectful. An impression supported by the very next post after yours...



"They"?
"Onward and upward"?

That's hardly the language of someone who is engaging with respect.

I honestly can't think of anything nice to say to this, why do you think you have earned my respect?.

I am genuinely interested.
 

srw

It's a bit more complicated than that...
It was quite a pointed assertion..come on now. Just like keith you tried to slap me down...don't pretend you didn't...
I literally haven't a scooby what you're on about. I've pointed out a number of times that you've made up things about me, and I don't know who keith is.
 

srw

It's a bit more complicated than that...
I honestly can't think of anything nice to say to this, why do you think you have earned my respect?.

I am genuinely interested.
Oh well, your loss.

I don't believe that respect needs to be earned. In my experience if you start from the point of view of treating others with respect then you're more likely to understand what they're saying.

And in my book treating people as others - "they" and discussion as something you "win" - "onwards and upwards" is disrespectful.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top Bottom