The CycleChat Helmet Debate Thread

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Mugshot

Cracking a solo.

Thanks for your comments. I will of course pass your thoughts to the management team in Hook of Holland, who operate this route, for discussion at one of their regular meetings.

Thank you for contacting us.

Customer Care Department
Stena Line
Harwich

You know you're on a winner when you get a "Thank you for your comments, we'll pass them on." :okay:
 

Mugshot

Cracking a solo.
I know what you mean but, given that I wasn't sure I'd get any response to filling in a form on the ship and dropping it in a box, I'm not losing all hope just yet.
No,no, fingers crossed :smile:
 

Drago

Legendary Member
* Mods, feel free to move this to another forum if you think appropriate. The topic covers several areas so I took my best guess.
*
This weeks afternoon plays on Radio 4 are about a lady who is in some kind of locked in state following an accident. She can hear and understand all that is happening around her, but is unable to physically respond.

Anyway, to the point.

It transpires the lady had fallen from her bicycle and acquired her injury in that manner. Lots of "oh Mum, why weren't you wearing your helmet?" type lines offered by upset offspring. Doubtless non cyclists are nodding sagely at the sadness of it all, and how the poor woman has brought this upon herself.

As the tale unwinds were told that the lady falls from her bicycle, and as she lay on the ground a car drives over her. Of course, the play does nothing to explain how a thin piece of expanded polystyrene with holes in it is supposed to save ones head from injury when a tonne or more of car drives across it.

Doubtless the script writer meant no harm, and it was intended to convey a gentle safety message to waft out of out radio speakers and add some meat to the smell of lentils and patchouli that normally pervades Radio 4's programming. Unfortunately, all it does is further reinforce the helmet argument to a public which have never been presented with a balanced view of the cycling safety debate.
 
Last edited:

Drago

Legendary Member
No, I'm somewhere in the middle. A wearer, but not entirely convinced.

In particular I'm not convinced that a lid will save the wearer from someone parking a car atop their head, like the Beeb seem to think.
 

arch684

Veteran
Specialized helmet owners manual.Even wearing a helmet low speed accidents may result in serious head injury or death.Have i just wasted 70 quid
 
CmtZK2FUIAAqIdL.jpg
 

h1udd

Active Member
Location
Bristol
Unfortunately, all it does is further reinforce the helmet argument to a public which have never been presented with a balanced view of the cycling safety debate.

Yes they have radio 4 have had debates about cycle helmets a couple of times.

Should this guy really have been silenced for his opinion, or should every comment spoken be counter argued by the alternate views as well ........ Or you could just accept it as a programme .... What about all the Christian programmes ... The son of God had never been proved either
 

User269

Guest
It's just a play. People say things like "if only........." in response to tragedy.
Interpreting it as some sort of propaganda or pro helmet campaign suggests the possibility of your own brain injury.

"If only I hadn't read this post.......................if only I hadn't replied to it......................if only I hadn't strangled the cat as a result..............."

PS I wear a helmet, but they're overrated as it didn't protect me from this post.
 

Drago

Legendary Member
What about all the Christian programmes ... The son of God had never been proved either
I couldn't say - I'm Jewish.

Interpreting it as some sort of propaganda or pro helmet campaign suggests the possibility of your own brain injury.
I would suggest Sir that your brain is injured, as you clearly didn't read my post properly. I suggested that it was doubtless intended as a harmless plot device, not as some kind of campaign by the controller of Radio 4 to have us all marching like massed ranks of fascists resplendent in our Giros. The bit you missed reads, "Doubtless the script writer meant no harm, and it was intended to convey a gentle safety message..."

No mention of anything more pressing, urgent or sinister. It's the thoughtless and ill informed do-goodiness - new word, (c) Drago Enterprises 2016 - of it all that grinds my gears. I in no way suggest or believe that the Freemasons have teamed up with the Illuminati and the Rand Corporation to take over Radio 4 and brainwash us into wearing helmets.
 
Last edited:

Melvil

Guest
God Radio 4 afternoon plays really are the most depressing listening this side of a brexit debate.

But to the point, it's fair enough for the playwright to offer their opinion and it probably does reflect the received wisdom about helmets.

Having just come back from Amsterdam where I saw about 5 helmets amongst the thousands of riders the whole time I was there I do think helmets are a bit of a statement of a non-cycling friendly country.
 

Hugh Manatee

Veteran
God Radio 4 afternoon plays really are the most depressing listening this side of a brexit debate.

But to the point, it's fair enough for the playwright to offer their opinion and it probably does reflect the received wisdom about helmets.

Having just come back from Amsterdam where I saw about 5 helmets amongst the thousands of riders the whole time I was there I do think helmets are a bit of a statement of a non-cycling friendly country.

Just occasionally though you are treated to a James McLevy, Inspector of Police play. 45 minutes of pure gold. I have spent a small fortune on duetting them on CD as well.
 
Top Bottom