* Mods, feel free to move this to another forum if you think appropriate. The topic covers several areas so I took my best guess.
*
This weeks afternoon plays on Radio 4 are about a lady who is in some kind of locked in state following an accident. She can hear and understand all that is happening around her, but is unable to physically respond.
Anyway, to the point.
It transpires the lady had fallen from her bicycle and acquired her injury in that manner. Lots of "oh Mum, why weren't you wearing your helmet?" type lines offered by upset offspring. Doubtless non cyclists are nodding sagely at the sadness of it all, and how the poor woman has brought this upon herself.
As the tale unwinds were told that the lady falls from her bicycle, and as she lay on the ground a car drives over her. Of course, the play does nothing to explain how a thin piece of expanded polystyrene with holes in it is supposed to save ones head from injury when a tonne or more of car drives across it.
Doubtless the script writer meant no harm, and it was intended to convey a gentle safety message to waft out of out radio speakers and add some meat to the smell of lentils and patchouli that normally pervades Radio 4's programming. Unfortunately, all it does is further reinforce the helmet argument to a public which have never been presented with a balanced view of the cycling safety debate.