Evil Astana, nudge, nudge, wink, wink, say no more. Vino will be along shortly to give an interview which removes all doubt.He does have some points and the UCI does come over as amateurish and making up rules on the hoof ....
... but Kreuziger is guilty as hell and has been smelling fishy for some time. It would be irritating if he got results that would later be annulled when the case is finally heard. Cookson is keen to get these BP cases sorted quicker in future.
It's not as if I'm making snap judgments based on prejudice and precedence...Evil Astana, nudge, nudge, wink, wink, say no more. Vino will be along shortly to give an interview which removes all doubt.
You met marmion in the pub?It's not as if I'm making snap judgments based on prejudice and precedence...
... a fat bloke down the pub told me.
You met marmion in the pub?
He does have some points and the UCI does come over as amateurish and making up rules on the hoof ....
... but Kreuziger is guilty as hell and has been smelling fishy for some time....
Indeed, a lot of what has been bad about cycling is due to "business"....and what's good for Tinkov's bank balance isn't necessarily good for cycling.
First WADA and now CAS have agreed that the UCI approach of suspending a rider with abnormalities on their Bio-passport is legit.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/kreuziger-loses-cas-appeal-and-will-miss-vuelta-a-espana
I wasn't sure of this at first but now I'm thinking it's a good thing.
I think the point at issue is the length of time between a possible anomaly and being found guilty or not guilty. Should the rider be suspended pro tem.Well, there's really not much point to the biopassport if you don't take action when anomolous readings occur.
Until now that has not been the policy or implementation.Well, there's really not much point to the biopassport if you don't take action when anomolous readings occur.
First WADA and now CAS have agreed that the UCI approach of suspending a rider with abnormalities on their Bio-passport is legit.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/kreuziger-loses-cas-appeal-and-will-miss-vuelta-a-espana
I wasn't sure of this at first but now I'm thinking it's a good thing.
...I wonder if Kreuziger will be in the market for a new expert.
I hope he's not using the same defence though.There was an interesting point on inrng yesterday. Kreuzigers medical expert is the same dude that JTL used. Given the short shrift his evidence was given by UKAD, I wonder if Kreuziger will be in the market for a new expert.
I hope he's not using the same defence though.