as a measure of this England team I would like to see Aussies bowling first at the Oval
Its the Russian roulette of the toss I find interesting - win toss win match (assuming the wrong option is not chosen) - as a measure of this England team I would like to see Aussies bowling first at the Oval
Maybe, but in three of the four matches, the team winning the toss has batted first.
Yup that is the conventional wisdom - win toss - bat first - that is why with all the chat being about sporting pitches I find it interesting![]()
Not so sure that the pitches are "sporting"
History tells the story. Only once in the past twenty years has there been an away Ashes victory. It seems that the pitches being prepared are so one-sided to suit the home side that there is a failure to provide for a truly competitive series.
Time for some independent body overseeing the preparation of test pitches. Otherwise we'll just get green seamers in England and rock hard pitches in Australia. Not having a proper contest is not beneficial to England v Australia cricket in the long term (not for any other test pairings)
History tells the story. Only once in the past twenty years has there been an away Ashes victory.
Clearly, the captains haven't considered the pitches to be unplayable green tops. Anyway, I much prefer a low scoring match to a Chief Executive pleasing bore draw.Yup that is the conventional wisdom - win toss - bat first - that is why with all the chat being about sporting pitches I find it interesting![]()
As does/did Siddle, but they decided against using him when it mattered. On previous Ashes tour to England, Siddle had been a real threat.
Looking like a good toss to lose.
Aussies 130 for 1.
He'll be determined to get a score here