Skiing vs cycling

Status
Not open for further replies.
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

sazzaa

Guest
Unbelievably petty behaviour in here. I actually quite like this forum but this shoot puts me off quite a lot. Can't any of you agree to disagree without the pathetic playground antics? Kinda sad really.
 

sazzaa

Guest
Did you like the article regarding risk?
On my phone i can't tell if it's a published article or just a blog? Who wrote it, what are their credentials, how did they gather the information presented? How did they come to the 25k per hour figure? I can't see any references either? (possibly because I'm on a phone though) Ahh too many questions...
 

Fab Foodie

hanging-on in quiet desperation ...
Location
Kirton, Devon.
On my phone i can't tell if it's a published article or just a blog? Who wrote it, what are their credentials, how did they gather the information presented? How did they come to the 25k per hour figure? I can't see any references either? (possibly because I'm on a phone though) Ahh too many questions...

Yes it's a Blog article. It's written by a cyclist who works at the giCentre a place where they know about data/statistics and how to convey them. Read the article on a computer, a phone is useless.

The thing about Forums like this is they are populated by a large number of very diverse people hiding behind avatars and the like. Some of these characters work in fields that are relevant to certain aspects of debate. For example, many here work in engineering, from mechanic to a rocket scientist. We have experts in transport, there are a lot of scientists, we have many experts in data analysis. We have medical experts, we have very senior and respected people in risk appraisal and management etc. etc. Without knowing this, many may look like pedantic, nay childish keyboard nobbers, who are actually smart and expert people using their substantial expertise to dispel common myth and supposition .... generally with great patience. Just because something appears obvious, doesn't make it true. Good data and analysis is the way forward.

The giCentre is based in the Department of Computer Science at City University London. We specialise in developing and applying new techniques for visualizing data. This ranges from visualization of 'big data' to personalised data presentation; from visual analytics to visual story telling; from cartography and GIS to statistical graphics.

We are a team of 14 academics and researchers with expertise in information visualization, cartography, design, computer graphics, human-computer interaction and geographic information science. As well as innovating in information and analytic visualization, we work extensively with a range of applied practitioners. Some of the clients we have worked with include Transport for London, Nokia, eonenergy, MediaCom, Unruly Media, Willis Group, Leicestershire County Council, the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory and the BBC.
 

Linford

Guest
2852894 said:
:thumbsup:
Do they? Can you explain how?
I did, you ignored it. You have already made up your mind, are not open to suggestion and are in reality just entertaining yourself with these idiotic retorts
 

theclaud

Openly Marxist
Location
Swansea
I did, you ignored it. You have already made up your mind, are not open to suggestion and are in reality just entertaining yourself with these idiotic retorts

More importantly, did Adrian deploy a thumbs-up winking smiley???!!**???***!!? Just when you think it's the same old sh*t till the end of time, you have to abandon everything you thought you knew and start over.
 
When moving the motorcycle 20ft at walking pace around a car park, I always make sure I use a thudguard when the lid isn't on.

Nice attempt to avoid the question, but it still works for me.

Now I know that you will waste everyone's time by avoiding again, but lets at least try to get a simple answer form you.

Why do you feel a Thudguard is adequate in this case when you could have the additional protection of a proper motorcycle helmet?
 

PK99

Legendary Member
Location
SW19
What has been stated, nay demonstrated is that it's very low risk, equivalent say to walking. Can we agree that's the case? ).

Cycling is not high risk, but I do not accept the extrapolation from population level data to me as an individual as valid:

As a pedestrian, I am to a large degree in control of the major hazards I face (ie when, where and how I interact with traffic by crossing the road). It is, by and large, careless pedestrians who come a cropper. I am not a careless pedestrian.

As a cyclist (as is SO often made plain in multiple treads every day on this and every other cycling forum) the major hazards I face are imposed on me by the vehicles I am sharing road space with. Even the most skilled and attentive cyclist is at risk from careless, aggressive or inattentive drivers.

(Almost as an aside: The fact that the population level risks are broadly similar,would seem then to suggest that the vast majority of drivers are in fact careful and attentive with regard to vulnerable road users)
 

Wobblers

Euthermic
Location
Minkowski Space
These crumple zones are not solid though...they are a very small percentage metal, and a very large percentage air, and the energy doesn't get 'absorbed' by these crumple zones, it gets turned into heat as it deforms or translated into kinetic energy,which is then channeled into other structures around it.

Jeez McWobble, your ego is truly immense...now how come you don't apply it in the real wold ?

It would appear that I did you the mis-service of assuming you had some intelligence. Read what you wrote above. Can you spot the glaring mistake? Hint: air does not absorb energy in impact. It takes energy to bend metal. What is it that deforms plastically in a crumple zone?
 

Wobblers

Euthermic
Location
Minkowski Space
Here is the numbers you are looking for...from the Netherlands

More cyclists on average died in single vehicle accidents than pedestrians who died from falls which didn't involve either cyclists or vehicles. Note how the numbers rise significantly when other vehicles are involved where cyclists are concerned when comparing numbers.

View attachment 35557

SOURCE

Except there is some data missing. The single vehicle accident fatalities are very similar for both pedestrians and cyclists. We don't have the figures for standard deviation (which, given the stochastic nature of these events, is likely to be high - as demonstrated by the large year to year variations in pedestrian and cyclist fatalities in the UK figures). The best we can say is that the risks of both cycling and walking are very similar.

You fail to supply absolute numbers of pedestrians or cyclists, or distances travelled by each group. Therefore it is impossible to make any judgement about risk per kilometre or indeed any meaningful comparison between them.
 

sazzaa

Guest
2853131 said:
You have no position from which to complain about anyone else's behaviour here.
It's a forum. I'm free to post my complaint if i like, nobody is forcing you to read it. Do you think you hold some kind of interweb status? Lulz, that's funny.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom