Best going for grx as it's better spec and it fits!
Yeah, I think so.
The CUES U8000 will fit but only if I use a different chain set, not the CUES chain set (which isn't compatible with my bike).
However, the 42t GRX RX810 chain set will fit and work perfectly apparently, although at just under £220 it's not much cheaper than the £250 44t Easton chain set.
If there's a SRAM option, within budget, of the required spec, then I'm all ears.
I think it would have to be Rival or upwards to equal the GRX though, but please do educate me as I know nothing about SRAM stuff TBH.
I presume they do thumb shifters for their 1x sets?
I'm sorry but it sounds like your LBS is talking utter cobblers. Having a look at the Shimano specs for the Cues crankset you can clearly see it is suitable for 68 or 74 mm bottom bracket widths.
If you have a 68mm BB, then you just space it out, this has been standard for the last 20 years or more. It's not a bodge at all and recommended by Shimano themselves. As for creaks and increasing the chance of failure, what rubbish, i expect that there's a lot of folk on here that have spacers on their BB's to accommodate the crankset. I had a a MTB triple chainset on my old Dawes Super Galaxy and that was spaced out as standard from the factory, I rode thousands of miles on that bike with no problems.
The only other issue I could see was with the chainline, but CUES has a standard 50mm chainline, so again, no issues there. I really don't see what the issue is with fitting it to your bike.
Shimano CUES chainset Specs:
https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/product/component/cues-u8000/FC-U8000-1.html
Can Anyone here comment on how the GRX 800 shifts, especially under load, which is supposedly one of the traits of CUES (shifting well, even better, under load).
Is the GRX more forgiving than 105 for example or do I still need to ease off the pedals/load to shift?
Never mind.
I’ve just left the LBS having ordered the GRX stuff. Should be done next week sometime.