I would like to introduce you to Linda from Rochdale a 40 year old body building driving instructor.So ... how big are these instructors? Are we talking just large, or ... you know, "well-built"?
True story.
I would like to introduce you to Linda from Rochdale a 40 year old body building driving instructor.So ... how big are these instructors? Are we talking just large, or ... you know, "well-built"?
Give way means give way ( to me ).
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HNTBOmcOTwM
This particular bit of infrastructure is not ideal, but if I’ve got my arm out to the right, it means they give way. It’s a good job I didn’t take it for granted he was going to give way.
I would like to introduce you to Linda from Rochdale a 40 year old body building driving instructor.
View attachment 525077
True story.
No, because OP accepts that there is a give way line on each side of the road but interprets it as meaning give way to traffic turning right.In my day-job we routinely analysefarkups"incidents" and ask ourselves:
How could this be prevented?
ONE approach in this case would be a "Give Way’ sign or a triangle marked on the road " on the cycle-path.
(better still, the layout needs a complete overhaul!)
I'll leave to you guys to assign blame , assuming you think that is useful ...
That would be an Ecumenical matter...
In terms of blame, if the party involved entered the discussion with the attitude of wanting to learn what other people thought and maybe see if there was any way they could themselves modify their behaviour, rather than assert simply that they are correct and that everybody who disagrees with them is wrong, then it might change the dynamic of the conversation.
Just took a moment to watch the full video. 20mph on a mixed use path in close proximity to pedestrians
Doesn't DfT guidance suggest max 12mph on shared pathways?
Only if they insist on taking a pig headed approach.Wrong again. I had my arm out early. Jesus, I don’t get what’s so hard about it. Sooner or later someone’s going to get hurt / killed.
Of course, otherwise we wouldn't be arguing about it. QED.But ideally the junction should have been designed to be no more dangerous to a pig-headed cyclist than any "normal" junction.
It clearly IS more dangerous than it needs to be.
No more dangerous than a zebra crossing (IMO), on which pedestrians have right of way, but only a pig-headed fool would walk onto one without first making sure that right of way had been granted to them.But ideally the junction should have been designed to be no more dangerous to a pig-headed cyclist than any "normal" junction.
It clearly IS more dangerous than it needs to be.
Yeah but we all need to go at the pace of the slowest rider.No more dangerous than a zebra crossing (IMO), on which pedestrians have right of way, but only a pig-headed fool would walk onto one without first making sure that right of way had been granted to them.
Is this particular crossing a known accident black spot?