If you view it purely through that lens, sure. But the idea behind the V2 is that you don't need air superiority for them to be effective.The V2 rocket. It's explosive load was about 1/10th that of a heavy bomber of the era, but it cost 10 times as much to manufacture. Therefore, in combined military and economic terms, it was 100 times less effective a weapon than a bomber. Pointless!
Whereas even the heaviest of bombers ran the risk of being shot out of the sky by interceptor squadrons and AA batteries before they ever got near their target, in the era before precise radar, point defence and anti-missile tech ballistic missiles were functionally unstoppable.
Plus, strategic bombing in ww2 was notoriously inaccurate, so pound for pound comparisons probably aren't that useful anyway.
More importantly, if it wasn't for the V2 program all of those nazi rocket engineers wouldn't have helped your favourite country in the arms race and there wouldn't have been a cold war, so there'd have been no Rocky IV.
You'd have to settle with a username like Hamster Pancakes instead of adopting the name of the best Soviet-era character in fiction (as portrayed by the worst actor)