Please don't wear helmets*!!

[Dan B]

The lack of response can only mean one thing

She doesn't think it's worth dignifying with a response? She hasn't seen your post? She has put you on ignore? Wait, that's three things. Which one of them is the only one it could be?

 

[Dan B]

Or perhaps there is nobody on the forum called @mytinynewt. That's four things. Damn

 

[Glow worm]

Thanks, well done in finding it, four years! Wow time flys, well done that man

Anyway, if you tell someone to F off and don't apologise why should you let them Lord over others

In the face of nonsense, Adrian's response seems pretty measured to me.

 

[david k]

She doesn't think it's worth dignifying with a response? She hasn't seen your post? She has put you on ignore? Wait, that's three things. Which one of them is the only one it could be?

Again double standards, she claims it's perfectly reasonable to defend her mate as she knows him and not me, therefore I must have asked for it. Then you come along and defend her, it would be better if you could all be honest and post the real reason which is I have a different view on helmets to you

 

[david k]

Or perhaps there is nobody on the forum called @mytinynewt. That's four things. Damn

My bag

 

[david k]

In the face of nonsense, Adrian's response seems pretty measured to me.

So if you don't agree with what someone says you see it as perfectly reasonable to swear, says a lot about you and the others defending it, only you all want to Lord it over doog and say he is abusive, absolute hypocrites

The post starts by claiming cyclists are always victims of drivers, you dwell in victimisation, complaining that people always have a go if you don't wear a helmet yet you see no issues with one of your own swearing or being passive aggressive,.

 

[classic33]

think you're getting your threads confuddled

Flummoxed even

 

[Glow worm]

Everyone hears what your're saying David, only we've all heard it a million times. Its being lectured at by the lid bridgade, lectures based on heresay from some, and cobblers from non-cyclists, that doesn't wash. And yes the compulsionists can f*ck off!

 

[ufkacbln]

Indeed. The one with the plaque on it .

Flummoxed even

Is Flummoxing a way or removing plaque?

 

[classic33]

Is Flummoxing a way or removing plaque?

No.

 

[david k]

Everyone hears what your're saying David, only we've all heard it a million times. Its being lectured at by the lid bridgade, lectures based on heresay from some, and cobblers from non-cyclists, that doesn't wash. And yes the compulsionists can f*ck off!

I wasn't pushing compulsion so the term cannot be justified with your version

And fine if people don't mind that type of language but don't then claim to be victims and moan that doog was abusive

 

[ufkacbln]

No.

You are right - that is flossing

 

[Glow worm]

I wasn't pushing compulsion

Ok fine, glad to hear /read it!

 

[Scoosh]

MOD NOTE:
Please stop the personal attacks, judgemental comments and assumptions and the Thread can remain Open.

If you do not like the posts of a fellow Member of CC, please feel free to use the Ignore function and restore peace to both this Thread and others.

Thank you.

 

[mjr]

I didn't see this at the time:

Never seen a post yet from a rider who didnt wear a helmet, boasting about how much less damage he suffered to his head by not wearing one.

...but I guess it means @doog has never read my posts about how my injury cleared up after I stopped wearing a crash helmet.

I reckon having a statistician on board might well cause drivers to behave differently around you.

No, I always have a statistician on board my bike and I seem to get the same carp as everyone else!