Oi!This statement is still true if 'toenails' is replaced with 'brummies'.
EDIT. No offence to brummies, I had to pick on some group or other.
Oi!This statement is still true if 'toenails' is replaced with 'brummies'.
EDIT. No offence to brummies, I had to pick on some group or other.
Then how do you know there are >1k ?There are more than 1,000 chemicals in a cup of coffee. Of these, only 26 have been tested.
Was it a Trek?Sir Walter Raleigh was the first person to bring a bicycle back from the Americas to England.
Then how do you know there are >1k ?
And irrational factoids?There are an infinite number of rational factoids and there are an infinite number of whole factoids but there are more rational factoids than whole factoids.
That's not true. You can created a one to one mapping between rational factoids and whole factoids, so there is the same number (countably infinite).There are an infinite number of rational factoids and there are an infinite number of whole factoids but there are more rational factoids than whole factoids.
That's not true. You can created a one to one mapping between rational factoids and whole factoids, so there is the same number (countably infinite).
However, the set of irrational factoids (as this thread proves) is uncountably infinite and therefore larger than the sets of rational and whole factoids