If your budget is £300 and the bike is £275, a courier should be covered by the £25 (give or take...bike couriering isn’t actually much)Thanks guys. It does look like a great bike. I don't think I have enough for a courier. I am looking for something a bit more local.
It's not the number of gears necessarily but the gaps / ratios between them. There are plenty of roadbikes with triple chainsets tooI have been looking at some road bikes. I really like the look of them. The extra hand possitions I think would be a benefit. The only thing is the gears. Most of the cheaper ones only have 14 - 16 gears. It's quite hilly where I live so I am not sure if this would be enough. This is one of the reasons why I was looking at MTB and hybrids. they have upto 24 gears. Does this make a difference?
Yes assuming you have clearance. Most true roadbikes are limited to max 25 or 28mm tyres. Maybe less with mudguardsthanks Vickster.
if I get a road bike. can I use different tires if I need to go on gravel paths or even grass.
most of the terrain I will be on is roads or cycle paths but there might be some muddy paths. the mtb was fine with this. I had an electric bike with small wheels. the tires where road tires and the bike was sliding all over the place when I went on the thames path. this is why I ask the question because I use parts of the thames path when I ride. thanks.
thanks Vikster. A lot of great information.Yes assuming you have clearance. Most true roadbikes are limited to max 25 or 28mm tyres. Maybe less with mudguards
If you want fatter tyres and drop bars, then you’ll need to look at a bike marketed as gravel/adventure/CX or a touring bike that can take fatter tyres
A CX bike is more designed for off road and mud. Something like this (but it’ll be too big for you)
https://www.cyclechat.net/threads/s...mp-for-something-smaller.252002/#post-5724625
It's an old rigid MTB. It's a 21 inch frame. I am only 5.7". So it's a bit big. I have seen a cheap 19 inch which could be good. I think I might see if there are any local. Thanks.
21" doesn't sound that big to me unless you have unusually short legs for your height. I'm four inches taller than you and have no difficulty riding old-school 23" frame MTB's with horizontal top tubes. Sizing is not much different from riding a 23 1/2" 700c road frame or hybrid. The bottom bracket drop is about an inch and a quarter less, but the frame is half an inch less and the 26" wheels mean the axles are another half an inch closer to the ground. The net difference in standover height between a large rigid MTB and a 23 1/2" road frame is only about half an inch, if that. Scale it down to 21" and you'll find roughly the same result.
I'm a believer in riding the largest frames that will fit me, because large frames have tall head tubes which means you can achieve comfortable handlebar heights. With small frames, you might be able to get a good saddle height with a long seat post, but you cant do that much to improve the bar height if the head tube is short, which can result in an uncomfortable aggressive riding position more suited to racing, not leisure cycling.
I have been looking at some road bikes. I really like the look of them. The extra hand possitions I think would be a benefit. The only thing is the gears. Most of the cheaper ones only have 14 - 16 gears. It's quite hilly where I live so I am not sure if this would be enough. This is one of the reasons why I was looking at MTB and hybrids. they have upto 24 gears. Does this make a difference?
Exactly so! My old Trek 800 Sport now also has 3x9, including a bottom gear of 28x36t.Depends on your attitude to hills! My trusty folder has 27 gears and I use every blinking one of them to get up a tough hill. I don't understand the gaps/ratio bit but those really low (high?) gears where you hardly go forward are really helpful on a hard hill. Just don't stop or it's impossible to get going again on the flat!!