New helmet law in Jersey

Status
Not open for further replies.
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

mcshroom

Bionic Subsonic
Doing 'something'
 

Big Nick

Senior Member
Different helmet, different testing requirements, very different capabilities in preventing injury and maybe death. You think cycle and motorcycles can do the same job?
Depends how fast you ride them....

Often yes, couriers, paramedics, police all use both for getting around quickly in city centres near me
 

Poacher

Gravitationally challenged member
Location
Nottingham
My odd beliefs?

Would those be the helmet wearing ones (even though it's completely pointless according to you) shared by around 95% of cyclists I pass by on my local roads?

The rest of us?

Again you insinuate a contrary point of view to yours should be outlawed and this thread was for people to agree with you or...what was it...'go away'

Where? Please quote the post and explain where and how TMN argued that a point of view should be outlawed.
 

deptfordmarmoset

Full time tea drinker
Location
Armonmy Way
Safety from what?


GC
Having to anything about the bad driving
Indeed, Jersey has a driving safely record that, even with only about 200-or-so miles of roads and a nominal maximum speed of 40mph, they realise that they have a problem. They commission TRL, who, to be fair to them, do mention that kids regularly hurt themselves falling off bikes without other vehicles being involved (surprise, surprise), but still conclude that compulsory kids' helmets will help. Meanwhile, they've all successfully managed to avoid the sources of the problem completely.

I'm by no means an expert on Jersey tax laws or lax Jersey laws but I gather they don't even apply the points on your licence system that rules in the rest of the UK. I sincerely hope I've got that wrong because otherwise kids are paying the price for something they never bought into.

EDIT: yup, just fines for speeding so far. Rich people can afford fines.
 
Last edited:

Profpointy

Legendary Member
What evidence would satisfy you, other than live running of the experiment here, which you are not having?
What evidence would satisfy you, other than live running of the experiment here, which you are not having?

Prior to compulsion being a real political threat to cycling, i would be pursuaded by any reasonable evidence that wearing a helmet improved safety - let's say from a country wide experiment where wearing rates increased from 10% to 90% and injuries reduced singificantly at the same time, perhaps where compulsion was introduced in Australia and Ontario - but this doesn't appear to have happened. Like TMN I used to wear a helmet long before they were fashionable because it was "obvious" they would help - however I stopped wearing one because the evidence doesn't stack up.

Now it.would need very solid evidence indeed for me to revert as I see compulsion as a serious threat to common.sense, cycling, and freedom i general.
 

up hill struggle

Well-Known Member
Does anybody actually believe that helmets are fashionable...???????? That's news to me. The wearers look like utter prats, including myself.

:laugh: there not fashionable? Not surprised by that, nothing i wear is, lol.

did anybody happen to see the cycle show on the tv ( i think it was 2 weeks ago ) James Cracknell was on discussing his career & the accident that he was involved in a few years back in America when he was hit by a truck, he sustained head injuries but is on record saying that he owes his life to the helmet he was wearing on the day & that if he had not been wearing the helmet he would have been killed in the accident.

watching that & seeing the damage the helmet received i find it hard to believe that he would have survived the accident had he not decided to wear one, he & the doctors believe that a helmet saved his life, that's evidence enough to persuade me to keep wearing mine if i had even been thinking of leaving it at home.

i can not understand why there are people on a cycling forum getting there cycling shorts in a twist because a government wants to make it compulsory for children to wear cycling helmets while riding in the the hope it helps protect children from head injuries if they happen to be knocked off there bikes.

considering if jersey passes a law making it compulsory for children to wear helmets while riding its hardly going to affect people on her unless your a child & live jersey or that's where you spend your cycling holidays with your kids.
 
:laugh: there not fashionable? Not surprised by that, nothing i wear is, lol.

did anybody happen to see the cycle show on the tv ( i think it was 2 weeks ago ) James Cracknell was on discussing his career & the accident that he was involved in a few years back in America when he was hit by a truck, he sustained head injuries but is on record saying that he owes his life to the helmet he was wearing on the day & that if he had not been wearing the helmet he would have been killed in the accident.

But is NOT on record declaring the fact that he has a financial interest and being paid to day this


watching that & seeing the damage the helmet received i find it hard to believe that he would have survived the accident had he not decided to wear one, he & the doctors believe that a helmet saved his life, that's evidence enough to persuade me to keep wearing mine if i had even been thinking of leaving it at home.

Is the fact that the same doctors state the Thudguard is effective unequivocal proof for it's use?




i can not understand why there are people on a cycling forum getting there cycling shorts in a twist because a government wants to make it compulsory for children to wear cycling helmets while riding in the the hope it helps protect children from head injuries if they happen to be knocked off there bikes.

considering if jersey passes a law making it compulsory for children to wear helmets while riding its hardly going to affect people on her unless your a child & live jersey or that's where you spend your cycling holidays with your kids.

The reason it is of concern is that once again we have a group of politicians that have been fooled by a pack of misinformation and lies[/QUOTE]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom